My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-21_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2011-06-21_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:34:43 PM
Creation date
6/22/2011 9:31:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
6/21/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Review No. 2
From
DRMS
To
CAM Colordo, LLC
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Corey Heaps <br />CAM Colorado LLC <br />June 21, 2011 Page 39 <br />Division Response: Response accepted. <br />60. If CAM elects to revise the sediment control system and eliminate any of the sediment <br />ponds for the railroad loop and, instead, uses best management practices, please revise <br />the protection of hydrological balance discussion in Section 2.05.6(3), the water depletion <br />estimate in Section 2.04.11(4) and any other relevant permit section. <br />CAM Response: Please see revised sections 2.05.6(3) and 2.04.11(4). <br />Division Response: Response accepted. <br />60a. Language addressing the requirements of 2.05.3(4)(a)(ii)(B) is provided on page <br />2.05 -18. This section, regarding embankment construction, may not be required, <br />since Ponds 1 and 2 are both incised. Please remove or revise, if appropriate. <br />Rule 2.05.3(5) Topsoil Removal and Replacement <br />61. Narrative regarding haul road and access road design/construction and reclamation in <br />Section 2.05.3(3) indicates that topsoil (if available) would be salvaged from haul roads <br />and that both haul roads and the access road would be topsoiled during final reclamation. <br />This conflicts with information in soils baseline and removal /replacement sections of the <br />application indicating that the roads are located within previously disturbed areas where no <br />topsoil is available. Map 9 ( "Topsoil Distribution Plan") does not depict topsoil <br />replacement on the reclaimed haul road or access road corridor disturbance areas. Please <br />revise the application as warranted for clarity and consistency. <br />CAM Response: Text on page 2.05 -10 has been revised to reflect the fact that no topsoil is <br />available for salvage. Text regarding topsoil replacement during reclamation has been <br />removed from pages 2.05 -12 and 2.05 -14. <br />Division Response: Response accepted. <br />62. Given the high salinity /sodicity of the topsoil to be salvaged and stockpiled, it is <br />recommended that salt tolerant shrubs including fourwing saltbush and greasewood be <br />included in the stabilization seed mix for use on the topsoil stockpile. Please revise the <br />seedmix to include salt tolerant shrub species. <br />CAM Response: The temporary seedmix, as shown in Exhibit 4, Table SM -1 has been <br />revised to include fourwing saltbrush and greasewood. <br />Division Response: Response accepted. <br />63. Please provide detail regarding topsoil stockpile construction and revegetation; specify <br />stockpile outslopes no greater than 3:1 to facilitate establishment of seeded vegetation and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.