My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-21_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2011-06-21_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:34:43 PM
Creation date
6/22/2011 9:31:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
6/21/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Review No. 2
From
DRMS
To
CAM Colordo, LLC
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Corey Heaps <br />CAM Colorado LLC <br />June 21, 2011 Page 31 <br />CAM Response: See revised pages 2.05 -3. <br />Division Response: Response accepted. <br />45. Page 2.05 -4 — please delete "Underground Mining" from the title of (2) Operation <br />description. <br />CAM Response: See revised pages 2.05 -4. <br />Division Response: Response accepted. <br />Rule 2.05.3(3) Mine Facilities <br />46. Section 2.05.3(3)(a) and (c) discuss the proposed mine facilities. For each facility listed, <br />please identify the map or maps on which the facility is depicted. <br />CAM Response. Please see pages 2.05 -5 and 2.05 -8. <br />Division Response: Response accepted. <br />47. Under Rule 2.05.3(3)(c) and referring to Map 16, "Loadout Facilities ", please explain why <br />CAM has elected to make the entire railroad loop drainage report to sediment ponds. It <br />appears to the Division that the portion of the railroad loop not adjacent to the loadout <br />facilities disturbance could be considered as a haul road not in the disturbed area as defined <br />in Rule 4.05.2(4) and, therefore, falls under Rule 4.03.1(4)(iv), similar to the situation with <br />the railroad spur. If changes are made to the sediment control system, please revise the <br />discussions concerning the sediment control system found throughout the permit <br />application. <br />CAM Response: Sections 2.05.3(4), 2.05.6(2) and 2.05.6(3) have been revised. <br />Division Response: In the April 11, 2011 submittal, CAM revised the sediment control <br />system for the railroad loop. However, because the newly proposed construction material <br />borrow area, adjacent topsoil stockpile and the unsuitable subgrade storage area will be <br />located adjacent to the rail loop, that portion of the rail loop would now be considered a <br />haul road within the disturbed area and, as required under Rule 4.03.1(4)(a)(iii) and Rule <br />4.05.2, be required to pass the disturbed area runoff through a sedimentation pond or other <br />treatment facility. <br />Since these three areas appear to be too large in aerial extent to qualify as small area <br />exemptions, it would appear that designed drainage ditches and a new or enlarged pond <br />would be necessary. Please provide a revised sediment control plan for the southern <br />section of the railroad loop. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.