My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-20_REVISION - C1981019 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2011-06-20_REVISION - C1981019 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:34:42 PM
Creation date
6/20/2011 11:20:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/20/2011
Doc Name
Revised 3/28/2011 Exhibit 7 Item 23
Type & Sequence
PR3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TABLE 5 <br />POND GEOMETRY <br />LCX -IN (SUMP) <br />LCX -DS POND <br />Elevation (ft) <br />Area <br />(ac) <br />Elevation (ft) <br />Area <br />(ac) <br />6705 <br />1.29 <br />6625 <br />0.13 <br />6710 <br />1.83 <br />6630 <br />0.61 <br />6715 <br />2.05 <br />6635 <br />1.21 <br />6720 <br />3.02 <br />6640 <br />2.04 <br />6725 <br />3.68 <br />6642 <br />2.54 <br />6735 <br />5.11 <br />6645 <br />3.39 <br />6737 <br />5.36 <br />6646 <br />3.81 <br />6740 <br />5.70 <br />6650 <br />5.69 <br />4.0 POND CLASSIFICATIONS AND SPILLWAY EVALUATIONS <br />The site is located in a rural, agricultural area and meets Class A criteria for dams in the U.S. Department <br />of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service Technical Release No. 60 (210- VI -TR60, October, 1985). All <br />proposed structures will be either constructed below existing grade or will have an above -grade storage <br />volume of 20 acre -feet or less, with a dam height of 20 feet or less (measured from the upstream toe to the <br />emergency spillway crest) and are therefore exempt from Mine Safety and Health Administration <br />regulations under 30 CFR § 77.216. <br />• The proposed above -grade structures will not be designed or operated for the purpose of impounding <br />water above the natural surface of the ground other than flood detention and are therefore exempt under <br />Rule 17 of the State of Colorado, Rules and Regulations for Dam Safety and Dam Construction. <br />The Little Collom (LCX -D /S) Pond facility will provide adequate capacity to contain or treat the runoff or <br />inflow entering the pond as a result of 10 -year, 24 -hour precipitation event, provide a nonclogging <br />dewatering device or conduit spillway to remove water storage resulting from inflow, and an emergency <br />spillway design to safely pass the 25 -year, 24 -hour precipitation event. The Little Collom Sump (LCX - <br />IN in -pit sump) facility will be operated as an enclosed sump within the Little Collom X pit, and pumped <br />into LCX -DS for polishing as water quality and pond drawdown allows. <br />5.0 RIPRAP SIZING <br />Unless specifically stated otherwise, riprap sizes were determined using the SEDCAD 4.0 subroutine for <br />designing riprap lined channels utilizing the OSM/Simons Method. SEDCAD also provides another <br />method, the Pader Method, for selecting riprap sizes. For background, both methods are summarized <br />below. <br />The OSM /Simons Method determines the flow induced shear stress on the channel lining and compares <br />this value to the permissible shear stress of the lining material. The permissible shear stress is defined as <br />the lowest shear force which will cause incipient motion of the D50 particle. To ensure a stable channel, <br />the minimum allowable D50 is selected by the program with an internally applied safety factor. <br />The PADER method compares the flow velocity to laboratory determined permissible velocities for <br />particle sizes. The PADER method assumes a specific gravity of 2.65 for riprap (Bureau of Land and <br />Water Conservation, 1996), which is considered appropriate for materials used by Colowyo at the mine <br />site. If the Pader Method were to be used, given the uncertainty in determining riprap sizes for steep <br />Exh. 7 -23 -6 Revision Date: 3/25/11 <br />Revision No.: PR -03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.