My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-17_REPORT - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2011-06-17_REPORT - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:34:35 PM
Creation date
6/17/2011 2:50:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
6/17/2011
Doc Name
2010 Annual Hydrology Report
From
Energy Fuels Coal Inc
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2010
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EFCI Southfield Mine - 2010 Annual Hydrology Report May 30, 2011 <br />3.3 Surface Water Monitoring Results <br />Mine Area <br />The mine and adjacent areas fall within the lower portions of the Magpie and Newlin Creek <br />drainages and encompass the central portion of the Second Alkali Creek drainage, all of which are <br />tributary to the Arkansas River. Newlin Creek is a perennial drainage above the mine permit area <br />and to the diversion point for the City of Florence Municipal Water Supply. Within the mine permit <br />boundary, flows in Newlin, Magpie, and Second Alkali Creeks are all ephemeral (refer to Section <br />2.04.7 of the Southfield permit application for more details). EFCI monitors any significant stream <br />flows in Newlin, Magpie, and Second Alkali Creeks, and also monitors any storm water runoff <br />discharge from the two remaining sedimentation structures. <br />In the mine site area, the current surface water monitoring program includes the following <br />monitoring stations, located as shown on Figure 1, Mine Monitoring Locations: <br />Station Location Designation <br />NC-2 E'hSE'/4, Sec 26 Newlin Creek (Upper) <br />NC-1 W'/ONE'/4, Sec 19 Newlin Creek (Lower) <br />MC-1 E'/2NW'/4, Sec 30 Magpie Creek (Upper) <br />MC-2 W'/2NE'/4, Sec 30 Magpie Creek (Lower) <br />SA-1 E'/ZNW'/4, Sec 24 Second Alkali Creek, near MW-65 <br />NPDES 002 E%2NW'/, Sec 30 Pond 4 (outfall to Newlin Creek) <br />NPDES 004 W%zSE'/4, Sec 19 Pond 5 (outfall to Magpie Creek) <br />Two sediment ponds and associated stations (001 and 003) were removed and reclaimed in <br />conjunction with final mine reclamation activities. In Addition, EFCI no longer includes previous <br />monitoring data from the single monitoring point that existed on Newlin Creek prior to second <br />quarter of 1997, when the two current monitoring points were established. <br />Surface water monitoring is conducted on a semi-annual basis, typically in April and December. <br />Field and laboratory analysis data for surface water monitoring stations are summarized in the <br />following discussions. Stream flow measurements since 1999 are provided in Table 8, and field and <br />laboratory data for the reporting period are provided in Appendix B. No NPDES discharges from <br />ponds occurred in 2010 so there is no corresponding field or analytical data enclosed. <br />Spring rain/snowfall events provided relatively small, short duration flows in Newlin Creek, and <br />water samples were obtained. Dry creek beds prevailed in Magpie Creek and in Second Alkali <br />Creek throughout the reporting period. Historic field and laboratory water quality data for the <br />surface water monitoring stations on Newlin, Magpie, and Second Alkali Creeks are summarized in <br />Tables 9, 10, 11, 1.2 and 13. The two sedimentation ponds (Ponds 4 and 5) did not fill to the point of <br />discharge during 2010, but did contain small pools in the 2" d and 3rd quarters from rain events. <br />A review of the April sample data from both Newlin Creek monitoring points indicates missing data <br />for total calcium, magnesium, manganese, sodium, and iron (see Tables 9 and 10). These same <br />parameters were missing from the analytical results for Oak Creek samples taken in May 2008, and <br />2010 AHR text.doc Page 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.