2011-05-25_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088

• Permit No: C2010088
• IBM Index Class Name: Application Correspondence
• Doc Date: 5/25/2011
• Doc Name: 2nd Adequacy Review
• From: Marcia Talvitie
• To: Mike Boulay
• Email Name: MLT
• Email Name: SB1
• Email Name: MPB
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman St., Room 215
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
COLORADO
D I V1 S I ON OF
RECLAMATION
MINING
SAFETY
Date: 25 May 2011 John W. Hickenlooper
Governor
To: Michael P. Boulay, Lead Specialist Mike King
Executive Director
From: Marcia L. Talvitie, P.E. Loretta E. Pineda
Director
RE: Fruita Loadout — Permit Application No. C- 2010 -088
2 "d Preliminary Adequacy Review — Engineering / Geotechnical
As requested in your memo dated 19- Apr -2011, I have reviewed the April adequacy response
package for the Fruita Loadout submitted by J.E. Stover & Associates on behalf of CAM -
Colorado, LLC. In my 22- Nov -2010 preliminary review of the original application, I provided a
list of 13 adequacy items. Each of these items is listed here below, along with the number used
in your official Preliminary Adequacy Review letter of 30- Nov -2010.
Rule 2.04.6 Geology Description
1(6) Various changes to the wording of Section 2.04.6 were requested.
Each item was successfully addressed with the adequacy response. Item resolved.
Rule 2.05.3(3) Mine Facilities
2(46) Section 2.05.3(3)(a) and (c) discuss the proposed mine facilities. For each facility listed,
please identify the map or maps on which the facility is depicted.
The requested information was added to pages 2.05 -5 and 2.05 -8. Item resolved.
Rail Loop and Bridge
3(51) The plan and profile of the proposed rail loop is provided on Map 21; there is very little
other information presented within the application. Based on communication with Ms.
Stover - Bishop, Union Pacific railroad has its own detailed requirements governing the
construction of embankments. Please provide a summary of those requirements for
inclusion within the permit text. Otherwise, the Division will need to require that the
embankments be constructed in accordance with the Rules for roads and embankments.
Page 2.05 -9 was revised, and Union Pacific rail line specifications were incorporated
into the application as Exhibit 16. The UP specifications are, however, incomplete.
Only odd - numbered pages have been provided. Please incorporate the missing pages
into Exhibit 16.
Office of Office of
Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines