My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-09_PERMIT FILE - M2011001
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2011001
>
2011-06-09_PERMIT FILE - M2011001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:34:21 PM
Creation date
6/10/2011 12:09:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2011001
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
6/9/2011
Doc Name
Response to 2nd Adequacy Review Comment #31 and Proof of Filing with Weld County
From
Tetra Tech
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TETRA TECH <br />RECEIVED <br />JUN U e ZoI! <br />June 8, 2011 <br />Mr. Peter S. Hays <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dlvislon of Reclametlon, <br />Mining & Safety <br />RE: Response to Iverson Mine (M-2011-001) Second Adequacy Review Comment #31 <br />Dear Mr. Hays: <br />Below is the Iverson Mine Second Adequacy Review Comment #31 followed by Lafarge's response to the <br />comment. <br />31. The Division will estimate the cost to reclaim the site based on the information submitted once the <br />Applicant addresses the concerns noted in this letter. <br />In addition, the Division will include costs to comply with the Office of the State Engineers <br />requirement for out-of-priority groundwater depletions. The reclamation plan proposes 44.1 acres of <br />open ground water will remain after the site is reclaimed. Lafarge or the landowner must obtain a <br />court approved augmentation plan from the Office of the State Engineer. The Division is required to <br />set the financial warranty at a level which reflects the actual current cost of fulfilling the conditions of <br />the Reclamation Plan per Rule 4.2.1(1). Therefore, without an augmentation plan in place the <br />financial warranty must be set at an amount which accounts for the exposed groundwater. The <br />Division has identified several options for determining the amount of the financial warranty. The <br />Applicant must choose one of the following options to be included in the financial warranty <br />calculation: <br />a. Backfill all of the pits to two feet above the groundwater level. <br />b. Install a slurry wall or clay liner. <br />c. Provide the Division with documentation from SEO, which demonstrates the Applicant owns a <br />sufficient amount of shares of water to cover the evaporative losses from the exposed <br />groundwater and the said shares have been committed to the SEO should the financial warranty <br />forfeited and the permit revoked. <br />If the Applicant obtains an augmentation plan prior to final release, then the financial warranty will be <br />adjusted accordingly. <br />Comment from Second Adequacy Review letter: <br />The Division prepared a preliminary reclamation cost estimate for the Iverson Pit. The Division <br />estimates the total cost to reclaim the site is $233,400. The estimate is based on the Applicant <br />choosing Option C above and will require recalculation if a different option is chosen by the Applicant. <br />A copy of the estimate is enclosed for your review. <br />Lafarge has chosen to go with Option C. Attached please find a letter from the SEO to fulfill the <br />documentation requirement. <br />1900 S. Sunset Street, Suite I-F, Longmont, CO 80501 <br />Tel 303.772.5282 Fax 303.772.7039 www.tetratech.com
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.