My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-06_REVISION - M1981185 (56)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2011-06-06_REVISION - M1981185 (56)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:58:13 PM
Creation date
6/7/2011 8:03:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/6/2011
Doc Name
Geochemistry and water quality review adequacy response (CN-01)
From
R Squared Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geochemistry and Water Quality Review Adequacy Response <br />Wildcat May Day; DRMS File No. M-1981-185 Conversion Application CN-1 <br />were considered in the presented hydrogeologic reports. (Dr. Gonzales, personal <br />communication-5.31.2011) <br />Adequacy Issue #22 <br />Water Quality Data. The data reported in various tables are suspicious and appear to contain <br />errors. For example, the hardness for SW-1 on 5/2010 is reported as 0.052 mg/L, which is <br />implausible given the concentration of calcium and magnesium. Also, between 5/2010 and <br />2/2011, the silver concentration of SW-1 is reported to increase 4 to 5 orders of magnitude from <br /><0.00005 mg/L to 1.3 mg/L, while the iron and manganese concentrations decrease by more than <br />3 orders of magnitude. Anomalous variations or values are also seen elsewhere, e.g., 7.58 mg/L <br />Nitrite in DG-2 on 11/2010 (this appears to be an erroneously transcribed pH value). The <br />Applicant needs to provide corrected tables or, alternatively if the data are correct, suggest an <br />explanation for these incredible variations in water quality. <br />Response #22 <br />Water quality report summaries have been corrected. Data from the laboratory were not <br />accurately posted to the summary data sheets and have been resubmitted. <br />Adequacy Issue #23 <br />Detection limits for some regulated constituents are above the regulatory limits. The Applicant is <br />advised that detection limits must be at or below the regulatory limits for the data to be <br />acceptable to DBMS. <br />Response #23 <br />Comments noted. <br />6/6/11 <br />10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.