My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-03_REVISION - C1980005
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980005
>
2011-06-03_REVISION - C1980005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:34:11 PM
Creation date
6/3/2011 1:57:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/3/2011
Doc Name
Submittal of updated vegetation monitoring results
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL5
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
secunda are the plants formerly known as big bluegrass (Poa ampla) that were included in the <br />seed mixes as such. The taxonomic treatment of Weber and Wittmann (1996) places Poa ampla <br />(as well as Poa sandbergii) with Poa secunda. Despite this merger, the distinctness of Poa <br />ampla is worth noting. <br />Photographic Record <br />Within each reclamation and reference area, representative color photographs were taken to <br />document the appearance of the vegetation in 2010 (Appendix 4). Within each reclaimed area <br />photograph, a placard identifies the particular area and sample. <br />Statistical Methods <br />Sampling was conducted at randomly located sites. Random map points for sampling locations <br />were generated randomly using ESRI ArcMap 9.3 software and Hawth's Analysis Tools for <br />ArcGIS (Beyer 2004). Garmin GPS60 units (accuracy to 3 m) and topographic maps were used in <br />the field to locate random points. Cover and transects were randomly oriented; production <br />samples were located randomly behind the transect origin. At each cover/woody plant density <br />sampling location, the slope, expressed as a percent, and aspect of the site, in degrees not <br />corrected for magnetic declination, were determined and recorded, as was the orientation of the <br />transect. <br />Assessment of Reclamation Adequacy <br />GENERAL <br />Formal (statistical) hypothesis testing (see below) was undertaken for the Phase II Bond Release <br />Block. <br />SAMPLE ADEQUACY DETERMINATION <br />Sample adequacy was evaluated based on total live allowable herbaceous cover by vascular <br />plants using the following expression: <br />t 2 S 2 <br />nm ld x\ <br />where: <br />nm = minimum sample size <br />s2 = Sample variance (n-1 degrees of freedom) <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.