Laserfiche WebLink
The DRMS appears to have consulted the wrong soil survey in making many of their <br />conclusions. This site is not located in the "Montrose County soil survey" as stated but is <br />instead, as documented in Section 2. 04.9 page 2, located in areas mapped in the "Soil <br />Survey of San Miguel County Area, Colorado - Parts of Dolores, Montrose and San <br />Miguel Counties." <br />The DRMS appears to be mistaken in stating that the ARCS soils survey "does not provide <br />expected productivity values for dryland pasture on this soil mapping unit." They are <br />correct in noting that Table 5A, Land Capability and Yields Per Acre of Crops and <br />Pasture "found on page 206 of the ARCS soil survey, and which is reproduced as Table <br />2.04.3-2, ARCS Land Capability & Yields Per Acre by Ecological Sites does not contain <br />any production values for "nonirrigated areas" but this information is found in Table 7, <br />Ecological Sites and Characteristic Vegetation, found on page 218 of the soil survey. <br />Therein, it states that this soil corresponds to the Semidesert Sandy Loam Ecological Site, <br />and that in its natural condition this soil produces 600, 850 and 1,000 pounds of <br />vegetation per acre, respectively. In its undisturbed or ecological climax condition, this <br />site is dominated by Wyoming Big Sagebrush, Galleta, Needle and Thread, Indian <br />Ricegrass and Western Wheatgrass, which contribute approximately 15 percent each of <br />the composition of the vegetation. These are forage production values under <br />"nonirrigated" or "dryland conditions' and it is logical to assume that similar forage <br />production values can be expected under similar conditions. The fact is that the forage <br />production values produced on the existing Dryland Pasture Reference Area, as compared <br />to the ARCS data found in Table 2.04.3-2, ARCS Land Capability & Yields Per Acre by <br />Ecological Sites, are considerably higher than the 100, 300, 500 pounds per acre currently <br />being produced by the Pinion and Ustic Torriorthents soils or the 400, 600 and 800 <br />pounds of forage being produced by the Progresso soils found in the NHN mine area. <br />Examination of the vegetation sampling data contained in Section 2 04.10 - Vegetation <br />Information, document that the average plant cover on this site, based upon the 2009 <br />sampling averaged 24.83 percent, while the herbaceous forage production averaged 299.4 <br />pounds of air-dry-forage per acre. This compares with the values of 26.60 percent cover <br />and 123.3 pounds of air-dry forage per acre for the Big Sagebrush vegetation type and <br />39.20 percent and 348.6 pounds of air-dry forage per acre for the Dryland Pasture <br />vegetation type. WFC submits that these data document the similarity of these areas. If <br />anything can be said about the forage production of the existing NH2 Dryland Pasture <br />Reference Area, it would be that this site is on the high side as far as a proposed reference <br />area site is concerned and the DRMS should be pleased to see that WFC is proposing this <br />high of a reference area standard. <br />The concerns raised by the DRMS regarding the relative high shrub component of the <br />existing Dryland Pasture Reference Area are difficult to understand and are thus <br />somewhat difficult to address. According to the data in the NRCS soils survey found in <br />Table 7, Ecological Sites and Characteristic Vegetation, Big Sagebrush is the dominant <br />plant species found on this site and under ecological climax conditions should account for <br />approximately 15 percent of the composition of the vegetation produced on this site. The <br />fact that it now accounts for only 4.75 percent of the total relative cover on this site should <br />Response to First Adequacy Review Page 42