Laserfiche WebLink
Wildlife (DOW), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) were notified of Permit <br />Renewal No. 6, and concerns were specifically solicited with respect to potential effects of <br />the operation on endangered or threatened species of plants or animals. Responses were <br />received from both agencies, and information was provided by the operator to address the <br />identified concerns. <br />During the course of the RN-06/TR-15 review, OSM prepared a Biological Assessment <br />addressing the potential effects of the operation on federally listed (threatened and <br />endangered) and candidate species. OSM also initiated formal consultation with the <br />USFWS, due to the adverse effects of water depletions to the upper Colorado River on the <br />endangered fish species that reside in the river (Colorado pikeminnow, humpback chub, <br />razorback sucker, and bonytail). In a memorandum dated June 16, 2006 "Comments on the <br />Biological Assessment for McClane Canyon Mine, Permit No. C-1980-004, and Munger <br />Canyon Mine, Permit C-81-020", USFWS indicated concurrence with the OSM Biological <br />Assessment regarding potential impacts to the Mexican spotted owl, Canada lynx, Uinta <br />Basin hookless cactus, DeBeque phacelia, and Parachute penstemon ("no effect'). USFWS <br />also indicated concurrence with the OSM Biological Assessment determination for the bald <br />eagle and yellow-billed cuckoo ("may affect, but not likely to adversely affect'). <br />Regarding the endangered fish species of the upper Colorado River, USFWS noted that, <br />while they consider any water depletions from the Upper Colorado River Basin to adversely <br />affect the endangered fishes and their habitats, they conclude that "the existing Recovery <br />Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin <br />will continue to serve as the reasonable and prudent alternative to avoid jeopardy to the <br />endangered fishes by the project-caused depletions". The USFWS determination was based <br />on information provided in the application indicating that the proposed operations would not <br />result in any increase in the estimated net annual water depletion to the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin. <br />USFWS had raised concerns regarding potential impacts of water depletion associated with <br />the operation on endangered fish species of the Colorado River during previous permitting <br />actions. In 1992, USFWS determined that the project was not likely to jeopardize the <br />continued existence of the endangered fishes if the company made a contribution to the <br />Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin. The operator made the recommended onetime payment of $41.93 ($11.98 per acre <br />foot of projected annual depletion) on November 16, 1992. In a letter of January 11, 2000 <br />from Richard P. Krueger of the USFWS to Sandy Vana-Miller of OSM, USFWS clarified <br />that, pursuant to a 1997 USFWS biological opinion, depletion fees are no longer required for <br />annual depletions of 100 acre feet or less (see Appendix P of the approved permit <br />application). Based on a revised water consumption estimate of January 24, 2002, prepared <br />in association with TR-11 and RN-05 (Appendix P), the McClane Canyon operation would <br />result in a maximum water loss of 13.39 acre feet per year, at a projected coal production <br />level of 1,700,000 tons per year (which is more than triple the projected maximum annual <br />production during the RN-06 permit term). Because the projected annual depletion is less <br />than 100 acre feet, the referenced depletion fee waiver remains applicable. <br />16. The Division has contacted the Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation Fees Branch. As of <br />this time, the operator is current in the payment of reclamation fees required by 30 CFR <br />13