My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-05-18_PERMIT FILE - C1981012A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2011-05-18_PERMIT FILE - C1981012A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:33:38 PM
Creation date
5/31/2011 9:06:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/18/2011
Doc Name
SUBSIDENCE CONTROL, MONITORING, AND MITIGATION PLAN
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 24 Subsidence Control, Monitoring, and Mitigation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 11, 2011 Page 3 <br />A comprehensive study of subsidence related to longwall mining in the Allen Mine was <br />initiated in 1981. The final report for this study is dated September 19, 1982. This study <br />obtained subsidence data (vertical and horizontal) over longwall and room - and - pillar mining <br />areas. According to New Elk, the data obtained during this study indicate that subsidence in this <br />area typically occurs as vertical displacement of the total overburden unit (i.e., very little <br />differential settlement) with dampened horizontal status. Partial subsidence data indicate <br />maximum vertical displacement of about 3 ft over a 6 -ft -high longwall panel and maximum <br />horizontal displacement of less than 1 ft. This displacement occurred within 6 months of <br />longwall undermining. Subsidence under room - and - pillar areas was considerably less <br />(maximum vertical 0.3 and 1.4 ft) with most displacement occurring within 3 months. Based on <br />the data obtained, it can be inferred that subsidence over the New Elk mine occurs quickly and in <br />mass, with very little visible surface expression. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that any <br />subsidence that may have resulted from undermining (more than 20 years ago) with pillaring and <br />longwall extraction has already occurred and that additional subsidence resulting from placement <br />of the refuse pile would be minimal. The stability of the refuse pile as designed (stability factor <br />[SF] 1.5) should not be affected by subsidence. <br />The post - mining and pre - mining land uses of the permit area are identical and are <br />described in detail in Section 2.04.3 of the current permit. The land use is shown on Map 4, Pre - <br />Mine Land Use, and Map 15, Surface Disturbance and Post - Mining Land Use —East Portal and <br />Map 16, Surface Disturbance and Post - Mining Land Use —West Portal. The Operator does plan <br />to monitor for subsidence at the New Elk mine. Mining during the permit term will be in the <br />non - renewable resource areas as shown on Map 20 Sheets 1-3—Structure Inventory. No retreat <br />mining will be performed under renewable resources. <br />3.0 SURFACE SUBSIDENCE PREDICTION <br />Since no pillar extraction is planned under this permit and development -only mining with <br />adequate stability factors (2.0 for mains /sub -mains pillars and 1.5 for panel pillars) is to be <br />performed in the Apache and Allen seams, AAI anticipates that no mining- induced surface <br />subsidence will occur. The stability of the workings was analyzed using the Analysis of Retreat <br />Pillar Mining Stability (ARMPS) computer code developed by National Institute for <br />Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) with the assumption that all workings will be <br />development -only. The program uses the modified Mark - Bieniawski pillar stability formula' <br />and evaluates the stability within a zone comprising a number of pillars. Appropriate pillar sizes <br />for mains /sub -mains and panels were determined for varying cover depths and extraction <br />thicknesses. <br />Coal extraction from 20 -ft wide entries and crosscuts is typically not associated with <br />trough subsidence, which is characterized by the formation of a broad and elliptical basin at the <br />surface and is induced by total extractions over large areas. Sinkhole subsidence, progressive <br />caving of strata from the mine roof upwards, is the only likely subsidence associated with such <br />narrow entries. However, several studies indicate that the probability of sinkhole subsidence <br />Mark. C. (1999), "Empirical Methods for Coal Pillar Design," Proceedings, 2nd International Workshop on Coal <br />Pillar Mechanics and Design, Vail, CO, NIOSH IC 9448, pp. 145 -154. <br />Agapito Associates, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.