My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-05-18_PERMIT FILE - C1981012A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2011-05-18_PERMIT FILE - C1981012A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:33:38 PM
Creation date
5/31/2011 9:06:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/18/2011
Doc Name
SUBSIDENCE CONTROL, MONITORING, AND MITIGATION PLAN
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 24 Subsidence Control, Monitoring, and Mitigation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 11, 2011 <br />Page 15 <br />Annual surveys should be conducted for the service life of the highway. Visual <br />monitoring should be performed on the roads. Any appearance of cracks, heave, slumps <br />or steep gradients in the roads should be noted. <br />• Structural anomalies reported by the surface owner(s) will be investigated. <br />4.11.7 Consequences of Damage to Paved Roads <br />Horizontal strains in excess of the allowable strain levels could create cracks, heave, <br />slumps, significant changes in gradient, etc. All of these factors could deteriorate the road <br />surface, possibly adversely affecting driving conditions or road utility. <br />4.11.8 Paved Road Damage Mitigation Plan <br />In case monitoring indicates onset of damage or potential for damage to paved roads, the <br />following mitigation plan should be adopted. <br />• Appropriate personnel at mine and regulatory authorities, as well as the owners of the <br />road, should be informed in case anomalies are observed that may indicate an affected <br />road segment. <br />• Regrading and resurfacing should be applied to affected road segments. <br />• The mining plan should be re- evaluated to ensure that operations will not further damage <br />the road segment in question, or an agreement should be reached with the road owner that <br />such damage is acceptable as long as it is repaired. <br />4.12 Brick/Masonry Low Rise Structures <br />4.12.1 Brick /Masonry Low Rise Structure Subsidence Control Plan <br />Several buildings on either side of SH 12 (a church, a school, and several houses) were <br />classified as brick/masonry low rise structures. According to the guidelines outlined in the <br />Pennsylvania Bituminous Mine Subsidence and Land Conservation Act of 1966, the safe lateral <br />buffer zone around churches and schools is obtained by multiplying the mining depth of cover by <br />the tangent of 15° and adding 30 ft. No development mining is to be performed within this <br />buffer zone. Both the church and the school are horizontally more than 300 ft away from any <br />mine workings. <br />Room - and - pillar workings may be developed beneath other brick/masonry structures as <br />long as stable pillars are left within a buffer zone calculated as above. The pillar sizes for <br />development mining within the buffer zone are to be determined using appropriate methods such <br />as ARMPS (Analysis of Retreat Mining Pillar Stability) so that they have stability factors of at <br />least 1.5. In case the workings directly beneath the brick/masonry buildings are to be utilized for <br />water storage, the stability of the developed pillars is to be evaluated on a site specific basis. <br />Agapito Associates, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.