My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-05-27_ENFORCEMENT - C1994082
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
2011-05-27_ENFORCEMENT - C1994082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:33:52 PM
Creation date
5/27/2011 11:11:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/27/2011
Doc Name
Notice of Violation
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Coal Company
Violation No.
CV2011002
Email Name
SLB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 17, 2011 C- 1994 - 082 / Yoast Mine SLB <br />Inspection Topic Summary <br />NOTE: Y= Inspected N =Not Inspected R= Comments Noted V= Violation Issued NA =Not Applicable <br />N - Air Resource Protection <br />N - Availability of Records <br />Y - Backfill & Grading <br />NA - Excess Spoil and Dev. Waste <br />NA - Explosives <br />R - Fish & Wildlife <br />R - Hydrologic Balance <br />Y - Gen. Compliance With Mine Plan <br />NA - Other <br />NA - Processing Waste <br />V - Roads <br />N - Reclamation Success <br />R - Revegetation <br />NA - Subsidence <br />R - Slides and Other Damage <br />Y - Support Facilities On -site <br />R - Signs and Markers <br />NA - Support Facilities Not On -site <br />NA - Special Categories Of Mining <br />N -Topsoil <br />COMMENTS <br />This was a partial inspection of the Yoast Mine conducted by Susan Burgmaier and Brock Bowles (DRMS). Roy <br />Karo of Seneca Coal Company was present during portions of the inspection. Weather varied during the <br />inspection, from sunny and warm to rain and snow showers. Locally, weather patterns continue with cooler <br />temperatures and higher than normal precipitation. The Yampa River basin is at 201 % of normal. Most of the <br />snow has melted off the upper areas of the mine site. <br />HYDROLOGIC BALANCE -Rule 4.05 <br />Drainage Control 4.05.1, 4.05.2, 4.05.3; Siltation Structures 4.05.5, 4.05.6; Discharge Structures 4.05.7, <br />4.05.10; Diversions 4.05.4; Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Ground Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Surface Water Monitoring <br />4.05.13; Drainage — Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8; Impoundments 4.05.6, 4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br />Pond 010 was discharging clear water. The embankment and discharge areas were stable and well vegetated. <br />Ducks (Mallards and Cinnamon Teals) were on the pond and several songbirds were observed around the <br />immediate area. <br />Ponds 011, 012 and 013 were discharging clear water; outfall areas and embankments were in good condition. <br />The rip rap of the emergency spillway of Pond 012 was covered with soil material apparently laid down to <br />facilitate equipment travel during repairs to the Pond 012 slide area last year. The soil materials need to be <br />removed and the rip rap supplemented as necessary to meet the design standard for the channel. <br />Post Mining Drainage YPM -20 needed to be maintained where it crosses under Haul Road B at Culvert EX -2. <br />Postmining Drainage YPM -22 was in good condition, but flow that should have been directed through this channel <br />moved outside of the channel and caused a gully (approximately 24" deep) through the shrub enclosure area <br />adjacent to the channel. The operator will need to regrade the upper end of the channel to ensure that flow is <br />routed to the constructed drainage. <br />The drainage that runs along the south side of Topsoil Stockpile TSS -I was severely eroded (gully approximately <br />375' long; 2' deep), resulting in the loss of a number of shrub seedlings that had been planted in the area. The <br />operator needs to repair the gully and armor the channel as necessary to prevent further erosion. There <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 9 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 3 <br />Page 2 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.