Laserfiche WebLink
inaccessible and posting would serve no useful purpose." 11AAC 90.301(d) specifically <br />addressing perimeter markers further states: "(d) The perimeter of all areas affected by surface <br />operations or facilities must be clearly marked before operations begin, except as provided in (b) <br />of this section. " <br />Approval of Alaska's regulations demonstrates that OSM recognized that perimeter markers <br />should not be required where they serve no useful purpose. The placement and maintenance of <br />posts which serve no useful purpose would impose adverse environmental impacts without <br />providing any offsetting benefits. <br />A revised plan is attached which fully and efficiently complies with the perimeter marker <br />requirement. This plan utilizes modern technology in the form of GPS to serve as the primary <br />means of marking the permit area. Physical marker posts are utilized where appropriate. This <br />plan is more completely discussed in the proposed revision. <br />If you have any further questions please contact me at 970-675-4322. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Scott Wanstedt <br />Environmental Engineer <br />swanstedt@deserado.com <br />enc: <br />cc: Jeff Dubbert <br />Paul Daggett - BLM