My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-05-25_REVISION - C1981018 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2011-05-25_REVISION - C1981018 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:33:49 PM
Creation date
5/26/2011 8:41:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/25/2011
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy Review
From
Blue Mountain Energy
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR68
Email Name
JRS
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DESERADO <br />BLUE MOUNTAIN <br />3607 County Rd. 65 <br />Rangely, CO 81648 <br />(970)675-4300 <br />fax (970)675-4399 <br />May 23, 2011 <br />RECEIVED <br />Mr. Jim Stark MAY 2 5 2011 <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety Divi-.)-, .,, -:ecJamatiart, <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 Mining and Safety <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />RE: Technical Revision #68 - B-Seam Dewatering System <br />Deserado Mine - Permit No. C-1981-018 <br />Response to Adequacy Review <br />Dear Jim: <br />The following is our response to the Preliminary Adequacy Review addressing Technical Revision <br />68 dated April 19, 2011. Itemized responses corresponds to the itemized questions and comments <br />found within the review. <br />1. No response necessary. Comment noted <br />2. While we don't see the confusion mentioned given the complete integration of SH-3 to the <br />dewatering system Table V-3, page V-25 has been amended as suggested. <br />3. SDH-4 is discussed on page IV-38 of the original submittal. As stated in this discussion, <br />the originally proposed ponds and facilities were never constructed. These ponds and facilities <br />are the focus of Maps 141, 144, and 145. Without these facilities SDH-4 becomes nothing more <br />than a plugged and reclaimed drill hole. Retention of these maps only confuses the reader and <br />they need to be removed. They serve no useful purpose within the context of the mining permit. <br />This comment is a prime example of the confusion that these `historic' maps can create when they <br />are not removed from a permit. <br />Please revise the bond accordingly to reduce the liability for these facilities which were never <br />constructed and never will be. <br />4. The reclamation estimate includes a perennial problem the Division has with estimating <br />seed costs. We have attached a table comparing DRMS estimates verse published prices from <br />Pawnee Butte Seed and BME's actual price received from Granite Seed late last fall. Pricing that <br />the Division or contractor would receive should be comparable to these prices or less given the <br />quantities involved with a project as large as the final closure. Specifically, the Division estimates <br />a cost per acre of seed of $236.30 while the current advertised prices from Pawnee Butte for this <br />seed mix is $124.75 and a similar mix purchased from Granite Seed by BME last fall was $120.75 <br />per acre. <br />INANE <br />ENERGY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.