Laserfiche WebLink
' Colowyo Response - PR3 adequacy No. 2 7 <br />May 6, 2011 <br />Rule 2.04.10 - Vegetation Information <br />1. Page 57, Methods, Sample Layout - In the second paragraph on this page, wetlands are <br />described as one of the four minor plant communities along with improved pasture, cultivated <br />land and disturbed areas. In the Sample Layout paragraph further on in the text, wetland is <br />combined with other bottomland types in the bottomland category. Please clarify which <br />category (bottomland or minor plant community) wetlands have been categorized for the <br />purpose of community inventory. Make similar changes in the last paragraph on page 59 and <br />Table 2.04.10-33 as needed. <br />CCC's response adequately resolves this item. <br />2. Page 63, second paragraph, the statement is made that the sagebrush reference area has <br />experienced "die-off' of sagebrush due to the recent drought and down-cutting as explained in <br />the third bullet on page 62. Down-cutting is a phenomenon that lowers the water table <br />significantly; as such, the water table likely will not recover to levels experienced before the <br />down-cut. Please therefore, provide further explanation and evidence to support the prediction: <br />"it is anticipated that sage reinvasion will occur over the next several years", as this may have <br />significant effects on the vegetative characteristics of the reference area. <br />CCC's response adequately resolves this item. <br />3. Page 69, Minor Vegetation Communities and Other Designations - In this section five minor <br />communities are described: improved pasture, sage grouse target habitat reference area, <br />cultivated cropland, disturbed areas and wetlands. In contrast, the introduction on page 57 <br />describes 4 minor community types. The explanation provided by Colowyo for not including <br />the sage grouse reference area as a minor community is that "the sage grouse habitat target <br />reference area was only established should the need arise to obtain habitat related parameters" <br />and should be considered as an "other designation." Please revise the text of the `Minor <br />Vegetation Communities and Other Designations' section so it is clear which communities are <br />considered the `minor communities' and which are considered `other communities.' Also, <br />clarify the purpose of the paragraph about noxious weeds in this section. The formatting <br />suggests that it is considered a minor plant community. <br />Colowyo's Response: <br />Colowyo has added sub-headings to this section of the text to more easily define the plant <br />communities considered "Minor Vegetation Communities " and those that should be considered <br />"Other Designated Vegetation Communities ". <br />4. On Map 4C: Vegetation: The proposed Aspen reference area and Juniper Scrub reference area <br />extend beyond the proposed Colowyo permit area boundary. Please redraw the limits of the <br />reference areas so that the reference areas are contained within the proposed permit area. Or <br />demonstrate to the Division that the management of the reference areas will remain under the <br />permittee's control throughout the period of extended liability in accordance with Rule <br />4.15.7(3)(b)(ii). Specifically, please address the portions of the proposed Aspen reference area <br />in T3N, R94W, Section 16, and the Juniper scrub reference area in T4N, R93W Section 18. <br />