My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-07-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2009076 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M2009076
>
2009-07-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2009076 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:49:04 PM
Creation date
5/23/2011 8:23:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009076
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
7/24/2009
Doc Name
Declaratory Order Info.
From
Venture Resources
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Gen. Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
removal of the waste rock piles with heavy equipment and earth moving vehicles (i.e. <br />"track type excavator"). The supplementary materials describe a potential 200,000 <br />tons of waste rock material located on 270 acres of property at various locations <br />within Clear Creek and Gilpin Counties. Supplementary Letter at 1. These <br />properties are dispersed but all located within a relatively compact area having a <br />radius of approximately 1.5 miles. The processing area is 40 acres, but the actual <br />processing will be conducted on limited space within that area.' Id. The petition and <br />supplementary letter indicate that Venture Resources intends to eventually excavate, <br />remove, and process all of this material, but at this time plans to conduct an initial test <br />project. The materials do not identify specific sites to be excavated, but state that the <br />determination will be made at a later time. The petition also states that the <br />concentrating mill will use gravity and flotation concentration processes. Petition at <br />2. The supplementary letter provides additional specifics regarding the milling <br />process. Along with its petition Venture Resources submitted a reclamation <br />feasibility report authored by DRMS's regulatory predessor, a best management <br />practices document also authored by the Division of Minerals and Geology, and a <br />Record of Decision issued by the Environmental Protection agency. These <br />documents generally refer to certain reclamation techniques but do not describe the <br />specific procedures proposed by Venture Resources and offer no information about <br />whether such activities constitute mining operations under the MLRA. <br />II. Analysis <br />A. The proposed activities constitute a mining operation subject to the <br />MLRA. <br />Based on the information submitted in the Petition, Venture Resources asserts <br />that the proposed operation is not mining and does not require a Mined Land <br />Reclamation Act ("MLRA") permit.2 Under the MLRA, the Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board ("MLRB" or the "Board") has sole responsibility for reclamation <br />of areas affected by mining. The MLRB is responsible for establishing reclamation <br />standards and is the only state governmental entity with authority to issue a <br />reclamation permit and require bonding to ensure reclamation. C.R.S. § 34-32- <br />106(1)(c); § 34-32-109(6). As part of its duties, the Board frequently makes <br />determinations regarding whether proposed operations constitute mining operations <br />which require reclamation permits under the Act. <br />Under the MLRA, all mining operations are required to have a reclamation <br />permit. The Act defines "mining operation" to mean "the development or extraction <br />' It is unclear whether the 40 acre processing site is among the 270 acres mentioned <br />by Venture Resources or is a separate area. <br />2 As discussed above, the Division believes that additional materials are needed to evaluate the proposed <br />operations. Based, however, on the materials submitted, the Division has reached conclusion that the <br />proposed activities are subject to the MLRA. <br />2 <br />1 .r.'.. iia..?. -...._ 1w ._.. ? ??? r"w'?l'?"6,? ?a.1 ?a-- - a?rfilsu'w „: ..: xx?: .??. _.ttiw?i.?.sia?.'""'=ia:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.