Laserfiche WebLink
Reclamation Feasibility Report -Virginia Canyon <br /> <br />Table 2 (Cont.. Reclamation Measures Feasible for Sites Observed <br /> Feasible Reclamation Measures <br />Site # Diversion Removal In-Situ Cementation Cap-in-Place Amend and Revegetate <br />126 XX X X X <br />129 X XX X X <br />130 X XX X <br />131 X XX X <br />132 XX X X X <br />135 X XX X X <br />140 XX X X X X <br />141 XX X X X <br />142 XX X <br />144 XX X X X X <br />145 X X X XX XX <br />146 XX X X XX <br />156 X XX <br />161 XX X <br />162 XX X <br />163 XX X X X <br />164 XX X <br />165 XX X <br />169 X XX <br />170 XX X X X <br />174 X XX <br />182 X XX <br />189 XX XX XX <br />190 X XX X <br />195 X XX X <br />196 X XX X X <br />197 XX XX X <br />198 X XX <br />199 X XX <br />202 X XX <br />203 XX X <br />204 XX X <br />205 XX X <br />PRIORITY SITE CHARACTERIZATION <br />There were 39 mine waste sites ranked 1 or 2. The ranking of the individual sites is given in Table 1 <br />above. These sites are considered the highest priorities for reclamation. In addition, there are two <br />draining mine adits where hydrologic controls should be beneficial, and may stop all drainage. Each <br />of these sites will be discussed in detail below. In general, the sites that received a ranking of 1 are <br />near or in a stream channel, and exhibit the greatest amount of historic erosion. <br />Williams, Rio Grande and Crown Point & Virginia (Sites #1 and #2) <br />Location <br />This site is located near the headwaters of the mainstem of Virginia Canyon (Figures 3 and 6). This <br />group of mine waste piles was sampled as sites 1 and 2. Site #1 consists of the waste rock pile <br />23