My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-05-16_REPORT - C1981019
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2011-05-16_REPORT - C1981019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:33:33 PM
Creation date
5/18/2011 12:45:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/16/2011
Doc Name
2010 AHR Review and Additional Issues with Permit Memo
From
Rob Zuber
To
Janet Binns
Annual Report Year
2010
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JHB
RDZ
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM <br />TO: JANET BINNS <br />FROM: ROB ZUBER <br />SUBJECT: REVIEW OF COLOWYO 2010 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT (AHR) AND ADDITIONAL <br />ISSUES WITH PERMIT <br />DATE: 5/16/11 <br />SECTION 1 <br />General Discussion <br />The text in the permit application indicates that sediment in sediment ponds will be surveyed <br />(page 4.05-14). In 2010, was this survey completed? If not, please explain why this was not <br />necessary. <br />Data from DMRs was not provided in the AHR, but a review of this data was deemed to be <br />important when assessing CCC water quality. Therefore DRMS reviewed this data and found <br />that there was only one day all year when parameters exceeded effluent limitations in the CDPHE <br />permit: on May 4, 2010, there were elevated level of Iron in discharge from Prospect Pond <br />(CDPS point 007A) and elevated level of TSS in discharge from West Taylor Pond (CDPS point <br />011 A). Please explain if a report was filed with CDPHE, or, if not, why it was not filed. <br />SECTION 2 <br />Rule Requirement - Rule 4.05.13(4)(c) <br />Subparagraph (i) - The word "quality" should be "quantity." <br />Subparagraph (ii) - The word "three" in the first sentence should be "four." <br />Subparagraph (iii) - A written interpretation of the data is requested by the Division, per Rule <br />4.05.13(4)(c)(iii). This was agreed upon during review of the 2009 AHR. This should include, <br />but not be limited to, a discussion on relatively high values of TSS and Iron (in May for sites <br />NUGSC, UWFGSC, and LGSC) and potential impacts on receiving waters, namely Good Spring <br />Creek and Taylor Creek.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.