My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-05-12_PERMIT FILE - M2011001
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2011001
>
2011-05-12_PERMIT FILE - M2011001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:33:28 PM
Creation date
5/16/2011 12:58:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2011001
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
5/12/2011
Doc Name
TowerCo Structure Agreement Process and Stability Analysis.
From
TowerCo
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TETRA TECH <br />Ms. Anne Best Johnson A1CP <br />October 27, 2010 <br />Page 2 <br />¦ A Noble Energy gas storage tank <br />• A gas well operations access road <br />¦ A communications tower and associated facilities and access road, owned by TowerCo <br />¦ Facilities associated with the communications tower <br />¦ A private residence and associated out buildings <br />• The Poudre River Trail owned by Weld County <br />¦ The Boyd Freeman irrigation ditch, owned by the Boyd Irrigation Company <br />• Various fences surrounding the properly. <br />STA&MI- AMLYSES <br />Stability analyses were performed in order to evaluate potential for damage to existing permanent structures due to <br />mine highwall slope failures. Analyses were performed with the Slope/W 2007 v7.17 computer program. For <br />each case we analyzed the most critical soil profile(s) based on exploratory boring data (i.e. the tallest highwall, <br />thickest overburden layer, etc). <br />The stability analyses were run in accordance with accepted geotechnical standards and DBMS requirements for <br />temporary pit slopes summarized as follows: <br />• Mine highwalls modeled as vertical slopes <br />• Residual soil strength parameters used for the upper 2.5 feet of weathered bedrock <br />• factor of Safety must be greater than 1.0 <br />Groundwater levels on the profiles were input to portray site dewatering. <br />Laboratory strength tests were not performed on soils from the site. The soil strength parameters used were based <br />on typical values for the anticipated soils and our experience working with DRMS at other sites in the area. The <br />input strength parameters were: <br />Table 1 <br />Q a.. U111A.. A....l..etn QLrnw.efh Z7.rs mare <br /> Moist Unit Saturated Unit Efreetive Cohesion EffeedveFrkdon <br />Material Weight (c Weight e (Nfi Angle (dees <br />Overburden clay 1 14 126 150 28 <br />Sand and gravel 130 137 0 37 <br />Clay Lease 116 119 200 22 <br />Weathered Residual 124 134 0 14 <br />Strength Bedrock <br />aCla tone Bedrock 124 134 500 22 <br />The scenarios were modeled with a general section developed from the most conservative conditions encountered <br />at the site including 6 feet of overburden overlying 33 feet of sand and gravel. Beneath the alluvium, the section <br />was modeled with 25 feet of residual strength bedrock on top of claystone bedrock. <br />The structures within 200 feet of the mine limit are shown in Table 2.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.