My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-05-12_PERMIT FILE - M2011028 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2011028
>
2011-05-12_PERMIT FILE - M2011028 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:33:28 PM
Creation date
5/12/2011 2:10:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2011028
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
5/12/2011
Doc Name
New 112c application part 2 exhibit H thru exhibit L
From
Weeminuche Construction Authority
To
DRMS
Email Name
KAP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 3 <br />AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES <br />Refined Alternative 4 Special Status Species Impact 4 - Significant: The operation of the ALP <br />Project without offsetting measures could adversely affect the Colorado pikeminnow and <br />razorback sucker in the San Juan River. <br />Effects of the project on the listed Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker were the subject of the <br />October 25, 1991 and February 26, 1996 Biological Opinions for the project. The Service determined <br />that the project as described in 1991 and 1996 would likely jeopardize the continued existence of these <br />species by appreciably reducing the likelihood of both survival and recovery of the species in the wild by <br />further reducing its numbers, reproduction, and distribution. <br />The Service's Biological Opinions included a set of Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs) to <br />avoid jeopardizing the existence of the Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker. For the 1991 <br />Biological Opinion (Service 1991), these RPAs were: <br />? An ALP Project that results in an initial depletion of 57,100 afy; <br />? Seven years of research to determine endangered fish habitat needs; <br />? Operation of Navajo Dam to provide a wide range of flow conditions for the endangered fish; <br />? A guarantee that the Navajo Reservoir would be operated for the life of the Project to mimic a <br />natural hydrograph based on the research; and <br />? Legal protection for the reservoir releases to and through the endangered fish habitat to Lake <br />Powell and a commitment to develop and implement a Recovery Implementation Program for the <br />San Juan River. <br />The RPAs advanced by the 1996 Biological Opinion (Service 1996) were similar and included the <br />following: <br />? A project that results in an initial depletion of 57,100 afy (Phase I, Stage A only); <br />? Research to determine endangered fish habitat needs; <br />? Operation of the Navajo Dam to provide a wide range of flow conditions for the endangered fish, <br />including low winter flows; <br />? A procedure to implement flow recommendations; <br />? A commitment to release peak flows out of Navajo Dam as agreed upon with the Biology and. <br />Navajo Dam Operating Committees; <br />? A guarantee that, based on the=results of the research program and dependent upon the prevailing <br />hydrology, Navajo Dam would be operated for the life of the ALP Project to mimic a natural <br />hydrograph;and <br />? Legal protection for the reservoir releases instream to and through the endangered fish habitat to <br />Lake Powell. <br />Weerninuche Construction Authority <br />- (r <br />P.O. 3.7 SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES 3-118 Box AA - 1 ou?aoc 51334 <br />jaN 1 M A 5 el.?-I E 9-.A-4 CL ? <br />C'lc t-k K - 9 AGC (-k t
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.