Laserfiche WebLink
PERMIT #: M-1997-007 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: JLE <br />INSPECTION DATE: April 26, 2011 <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This was an acreage reduction request (AR01) inspection of the Bijou Clay Pit; DRMS File No. M-1997-007, <br />operated by Acme Brick Company. This site is located approximately 7.5 miles east of Kiowa, Colorado in <br />Elbert County. I, Jared Ebert of the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety conducted the <br />inspection. Mr. Robert Tibbetts of Acme Brick Company accompanied me on the inspection. <br />This is a 30.06 acre 112c clay mining operation. The Operator requested a release of 9.2 acres of the western <br />portion of the site. The majority of this area appears to have not been disturbed by the mining operation. The <br />Division mapped the currently market permit boundary and affected land boundary using a Trimble GeoXT <br />GPS unit. A map of the Division's findings is enclosed with this report. Based on these measurements, it <br />appears a portion of the land requested for release has been affected by the mining operation. The Division <br />must deny the acreage reduction request. <br />The boundary markers posted at the site are not in the correct location. The shape and size of the marked <br />permit boundary does not coincide with the current approved mining plan map. Based on the Division's <br />survey, approximately 20 acres of land have been affected by the mining operation. At this time, it is unclear <br />if land has been affected outside of the approved permit boundary. This issue is cited as a problem at the <br />beginning of this inspection report and will require corrective action to be taken by the Operator. The <br />Operator will need to conduct a survey of the site and correctly mark the permit boundary. Once this activity <br />is completed, the Operator will need to send a written notice to the Division indicating this has been <br />completed, and the Division will conduct a follow-up inspection to verify the boundary has been marked <br />correctly. <br />The current affected land consists of; an access/haul road that enters the site at the western end of the <br />property, a clay stockpile storage area and a graded area. The graded area is located in the Phase 2 and 3 <br />mining area. According to Mr. Tibbetts, a large highwall pit excavation was located in the graded portion of <br />the site. The Operator has graded this area creating a basin that drains to a central location along the <br />northeast boundary. The map depicts the slope aspect and drainage pattern with yellow arrows. It appears <br />all the storm water from the graded area drains from this location and a significant cut has formed along the <br />northeast boundary. This issue is cited as a problem at the beginning of the inspection report and will <br />require corrective action to be taken by the Operator. The erosion gulley will need to be fixed and stabilized <br />to prevent offsite damage (with rip-rap, straw bales... etc.). A copy of this report will be sent to the Colorado <br />Department of Health and Environment. The side slopes of the graded area have been constructed at <br />approximately a 3:1 horizontal to vertical ratio or less. According to Mr. Tibbetts, topsoil has not been spread <br />over this area; however, the area was broadcast seeded last fall. No vegetation has begun to establish in this <br />area. A stockpile of topsoil appears to be located in the northwest corner of the affected land. According to <br />the current approved reclamation plan, the Operator must spread 4 inches of topsoil over the affected land. <br />The Operator will need to use this topsoil material for reclamation. Currently, the topsoil stockpile is stable <br />with vegetative cover. <br />According to the current approved mining plan, a large quantity (up to 25 feet) of overburden existed above <br />the clay material. Based on Mr. Tibbetts description of the original pit excavation, it is likely the Operator <br />stockpiled the overburden south of the pit excavation. It appears part of the southern graded area was part of <br />the overburden pile. The backside of the pit with a southern aspect is very steep ranging from a 1:1 horizontal <br />Page 2 of 7