My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-05-05_REVISION - C1981012 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2011-05-05_REVISION - C1981012 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:33:19 PM
Creation date
5/6/2011 1:49:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/5/2011
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy Review #1
From
DRMS
To
New Elk Coal Company
Type & Sequence
TR56
Email Name
KAG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
23. Please provide a revised version of Map 1, Surface Ownership showing the <br />TR-56 permit boundary as described by information submitted under Rule <br />2.03, legal description of the permit boundary (question #1 of this letter). <br />NECC Response: Map 1 permit boundary has been added. <br />DRMS Response: Response partially accepted. The Division questions the <br />surface ownership by the DOW for lands north of Highway 12 and east of <br />the RDA as indicated on Map 1. Please check this ownership and <br />correct Map 1 if necessary. <br />24. Please provide Map 2 Coal Ownership at a scale of 1 inch= 1500 feet to <br />match the scale of the Map 1 Surface Ownership. <br />NECC Response: No response to this question was provided. <br />DRMS Response: Please respond to this question. <br />25. The Division must find that the affected area is not within 300 feet of a <br />school or church. Using the materials submitted with TR-56, it is not clear <br />what the exact distance is from the affected area to the church and school <br />shown in Detail VV Map 20, sheet 1. Please provide additional information <br />to show the horizontal distance from the affected area to these two buildings. <br />NECC Response: Figure 19 provides the detail required. <br />DRMS Response: Response accepted assuming Figure label resolution. <br />26. Please correct the text on page 2.05-3b (revised 2114111) to read "days from <br />the first placement of development waste from underground rehabilitation <br />OR the time..." <br />NECC Response: Permit text corrected. <br />DRMS Response: Response accepted. <br />27. Please correct the grammar and punctuation in the last paragraph of page <br />2.05-88 (revised 1/31/11). <br />NECC Response: Paragraph corrected. <br />DRMS Response: Response accepted. <br />28. For all structures to be undermined, limited monitoring of subsidence <br />monuments is required for each of those structures. The proposed plan
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.