Laserfiche WebLink
C1981019 TR84 Adequacy NO. 3 4 May 4, 2011 <br />F <br />11. Page 4.15-17, picture `Aspen/Tall Shrub Establishment General Location - This picture shows <br />the location of the proposed aspen/tall shrub trial area but does not give adequate reference to <br />location in the mine, topography, scale or cardinal directions. Please include a map of the <br />proposed area addressing these issues and the map standards of Rule 2.10. <br />12. Page 4.15-17, picture `Aspen/Tall Shrub Establishment General Location - This picture shows <br />the general location of the proposed aspen/tall shrub field trial area. The area appears to have a <br />north facing, shallow slope that is generally flat and has been disturbed by mining activity. The <br />area is also surrounded by sagebrush steppe habitat. A sagebrush steppe is characterized by low <br />annual precipitation and can be characterized a semi-arid grassland. These conditions are not <br />favorable to the establishment of an aspen community. Aspens tend to occupy sites that are <br />mesic with fine textured soils that are more fertile and they have a low drought tolerance. The <br />Division suggests that a more suitable site for the aspen trial areas be used, such as in the bottom <br />of a drainage. Please consider a relocation of the field trial area and discuss any possibilities. <br />Please show the proposed location of the field trial area on Map 28 or CCC's Reclamation Map. <br />13. Page 4.15-18, table `Aspen & Tall Shrub Field Trials Modified Sagebrush Steppe Mix' - The <br />sagebrush steppe seed mix has been modified to reduce the volume of " low shrubs" in favor of <br />the tall shrubs in the mix and the grasses were also reduced to minimize competition while still <br />providing soil stabilization. The tall shrubs that were added to the seed mix (i.e. Acer glabrum <br />and Prunus virginiana) are adapted to more mesic sites than the grasses and forbs in the same <br />seed mix. Please provide a separate seed mix designed for these field trials that contains a low <br />rate of grasses and forbs combined with tall shrubs that are adapted to mesic sites consistent with <br />the conditions associated with aspen groves. <br />This item has been adequately resolved. <br />14. Page 4.15-18, Illustration "Expected Field Implementation Plan for Aspen/Tall Shrub Field <br />Trials" - The diagram illustrates that the planting arrangements and density for containerized <br />plant stock is 550 plants/acre. The planned area is shown to be 220 feet by 220 feet or 48,400 <br />W. An acre is actually 43,560 ft2, _10% less than the diagram illustrates. This difference in <br />square footage lowers the actual stem count per acre resulting in a perceived mortality rate. <br />Please adjust the planting densities to 43,560 ft2 per acre to reflect this difference. <br />This item has been adequately resolved. <br />Technical Revision was initially submitted December 29, 2009. Revised pages submitted by CCC on <br />November 8, 2010 are identified as revised on "12/22/2009". The Division sent CCC a second adequacy <br />letter on February 25, 2011. CCC provided responses to the Division's second adequacy letter on April 11, <br />2011. Revised pages submitted by CCC on April 11, 2011 in response to the Division's second adequacy <br />letter, are dated, "Revision date: 12/22/09". The Division requests that CCC revise the date on the revised <br />pages to reflect the date that CCC has changed text on the page. This will help assure that the appropriate <br />version of the revised pages get approved and incorporated into the DRMS permit application package <br />(PAP), and to assure that CCC's PAP remains consistent with the approved DRMS copy. The Division's