My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-04-29_HYDROLOGY - M1977573
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1977573
>
2011-04-29_HYDROLOGY - M1977573
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:32:59 PM
Creation date
5/4/2011 7:38:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977573
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
4/29/2011
Doc Name
Mining Opns. w/ Exp. GW
From
Transit Mix Concrete
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
AJW
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Decree of the Water Court <br />Case No. 03CW8, Water Div. 2 <br />Transit Mix of Pueblo, Inc., et al. <br />Page 16 <br />other storege vessel, then following entry of such decree the Applicants, with notice to all opposers, <br />may petition the Court to withdraw its water leased from Pueblo Board of Water Works and/or its <br />shares of stock in Twin Lakes Canal and Reservoir Company as sources of augmentation water <br />in this plan for augmentation. Such petition shall be granted if Applicants proves by a <br />preponderance of the evidence that the removal of such water rights from the augmentation plan <br />will not result in too little water being available to replace the depletions required to be replaced <br />pursuant to this plan for augmentation. <br />43. Southeastern stipulated to entry of this decree without a requirement that all net <br />evaporation from pre-1981 gravel pit reservoirs be fully augmented, solely for the purpose of <br />settlement. Entry of this decree without the requirement of fully augmenting evaporation from pre- <br />1981 reservoirs shall not act as a precedent for any future cases in which this is an issue, nor shall <br />it bind Southeastern in any such future cases. <br />44. The stipulation between Applicants and the City of Aurora for entry of this decree <br />shall not be construed as concurrence by either of them beyond this decree with any findings of <br />fact or conclusions of law contained herein, orwith the engineering methodologies utilized by either <br />party in arriving at their stipulation. <br />45. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this application for a period of five years from <br />the date of entry of this decree, pursuant to C.R.S. 37-92-304(6). Any person seeking to invoke <br />the retained jurisdiction of the Court shall file a verified petition with the Court. The petition shall <br />set forth with particularity the factual basis upon which the requested reconsideration is premised, <br />together with proposed decretal language to effect the petition. The person lodging the petition <br />shall have the burden of going forward to establish prima facie facts alleged in the petition. If the <br />15003 h/transit mix/decree 02-22-09
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.