My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-04-26_REVISION - C1981012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2011-04-26_REVISION - C1981012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:32:51 PM
Creation date
4/26/2011 1:22:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/26/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Responses
From
Agapito Associates Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR56
Email Name
KAG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Kent Gorham <br />April 25, 2011 <br />Page 6 <br />18. On Map 8 Regional Hydrology, text in the map legend for the bedrock wells (green and <br />purple symbols) should be separated for proper symbol explanations. Also, noted on the <br />map is the annotation "Cirbella Canyon" which should be labeled "Ciruela Canyon." <br />Please correct these minor errors as noted. <br />NECC Response: Map 8 has been corrected to show the TR-56 permit boundary, the <br />legend adjusted for symbol explanations, "Ciruela Canyon" is spelled correctly and NE- <br />1-10 and NE-6-10a, NE-6-10b are shown as monitoring wells. <br />19. In the legend on Map 20, Sheet 1, please add a reference to indicate detail is shown not <br />only on Sheet 2 but also on Sheet 3. <br />NECC Response: The legend on Map 20 has been corrected. <br />20. The scale on Map 20, Sheet 3 states "1 inch=120 feet" but measures 1 inch =60 feet. <br />Please correct as necessary. <br />NECC Response: The scale on Map 20 has been corrected to 1 inch = 60 ft. <br />21. Gas well 31-4 Ciruela Canyon is spotted on Map 20 Sheet 1 in Section 30 rather than <br />Section 31. Nothing apparently exists at the location as shown in the detail. Is this <br />location properly spotted on the map? <br />NECC Response: The map has been corrected to show the detail of gas well 31-4. The <br />well is located in Section 30 by land field survey. <br />22. Please provide a revised version of Map 1, Surface Ownership showing the TR-56 permit <br />boundary as described by information submitted under Rule 2.03, legal description of the <br />permit boundary (question #1 of this letter) properly spotted on the map? <br />NECC Response: Map 1 has been revised to show the TR-56 permit boundary including <br />the metes and bounds labels. <br />25. The Division must find that the affected area is not within 300 feet of a school or church. <br />Using the materials submitted with TR-56, it is not clear what the exact distance is from <br />the affected area to the church and school shown in Detail VV Map 20, Sheet 1. Please <br />provide additional information to show the horizontal distance from the affected area to <br />these two buildings. <br />NECC Response: Figure 19 (page 2.05-92) shows the detail of the affected area of the <br />Detail VV. The horizontal distance to the mine workings is greater than 300 ft. <br />26. Please correct the text on page 2.05-3b (revised 2/14/11) to read "days from the first <br />placement of development waste from underground rehabilitation OR the time..." <br />Agapito Associates, Inc.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.