My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-04-22_REVISION - C1981019
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2011-04-22_REVISION - C1981019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:32:47 PM
Creation date
4/26/2011 1:21:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/22/2011
Doc Name
2nd Adequacy Review Letter
From
DRMS
To
Colowyo Coal Company
Type & Sequence
PR3
Email Name
JHB
KAG
RDZ
TAK
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Colowyo, C1981-019, PR3 adequacy No. 2 13 April 22, 2011 <br />increased shrub survival and density. The Division would like to see a more proactive fencing <br />plan to prevent the destruction of the shrubs rather than a reactive approach after "excessive <br />damage (severe hedging) to those populations is noted." Please submit a comprehensive <br />fencing plan which addresses: location of exclosure (include a map), size of the exclosure and <br />plant community in the exclosure. <br />11. Page 112, last paragraph - The use of the "banding" technique is not warranted on slopes with <br />a gradient less than 10%. The Division feels that the techniques of contour furrows, surface <br />roughening and seeding on the contour, already proposed by Colowyo, is adequate for erosion <br />control on these slopes. Please remove this paragraph from the text. <br />This item has been resolved. <br />12. Page 113, last paragraph - The use of the word indication/indicated is unclear in this sentence. <br />Please revise.bfb <br />CCC removed the word "indicated". This item has been resolved. <br />13. Please address all of the items in the vegetation section of the attached CDOW letter dated Feb <br />15, 2011 in this section of the permit. <br />This item has been resolved. <br />2.05.6(2) Fish and Wildlife Plan <br />1. During the Division's Adequacy Review for PR-3, the Division received comments from the <br />Division of Wildlife (attached letter Feb 15, 2011) pertaining to the mitigation of impacts to <br />wildlife. The Division will not make further comments about CCC's wildlife mitigation plan <br />until Colowyo has had a chance to review this letter and make appropriate changes to PR-3. <br />CCC replied in the cover letter but did not change any permit text. Please document any new <br />meetings with CDOW. At the time of the Division's second Adequacy Review for PR-3 (April <br />2011), Colowyo was in the process of contacting the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) <br />to discuss the issues raised in CDOW letter dated Feb 15, 2011. The Division will not make <br />comments about Colowyo's wildlife mitigation plan until Colowyo submits a plan <br />incorporating the results of the meeting. <br />Rule 2.05.60)(a) Protection of the Hydrologic Balance <br />The application contains limited permit text narrative with regard to impacts to registered <br />ground water users due to pit dewatering and development and is deficient with regard to <br />impacts to ground water users (see discussion above under Rule 2.04.7(3)). Please expand the <br />permit text narrative under the section discussing probable hydrologic consequences to ground <br />water quantity, with particular emphasis on discussion of impacts to wells owned by others.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.