My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-04-19_REVISION - M1977342
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977342
>
2011-04-19_REVISION - M1977342
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:19:02 PM
Creation date
4/20/2011 7:31:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977342
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/19/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Climax Molybdenum Company
Type & Sequence
TR4
Email Name
PSH
AJW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 2 <br />reflected on the as-built drawings". Please provide a summary of the modifications and indicate <br />the changes using revision clouds (to indicate changes from the "issued for construction" drawings) <br />in the as-built drawing submittal. <br />Attachment 2 - Mill Seepwater Pipeline Extension <br />5. The cover letter indicates construction was approved in a July 16, 2009 letter from Allen Sorenson. <br />All four drawings are dated 5/18/09 or earlier and cannot be considered "As-Built" for the pipeline <br />extension. Please explain the discrepancy or submit revised as-built drawings for the pipeline <br />extension. <br />6. As in Attachment 1 (Question #2 above), none of the four (4) drawings in Attachment 2 have any <br />labels or indicators to suggest they are as-built drawings. Please explain this discrepancy. <br />Attachment 3 - Orfom D8 Depressant Construction Certification <br />7. The cover letter indicates construction was approved in a May 22, 2008 letter from Allen Sorenson. <br />All eight drawings are dated 3/28/08 and cannot be considered "As-Built" for the depressant <br />construction. Please explain the discrepancy or submit revised as-built drawings for the Orfom D8 <br />Depressant construction. <br />8. As in Attachment 1 (Question #2 above), none of the eight (8) drawings in Attachment 3 have any <br />labels or indicators to suggest they are as-built drawings. All are labeled "Issued for Construction", <br />which is not acceptable. Please explain the discrepancy or submit revised as-built drawings for the <br />Orfom D8 Depressant construction. <br />Please be advised that the Henderson Mine technical revision (TR-04) may be deemed inadequate, and will <br />be denied on May 19, 2011 unless the above mentioned adequacy review items are addressed to the <br />satisfaction of the Division. If you feel more time is needed to complete your reply, the Division can grant <br />an extension to the decision date. This will be done upon receipt of a written waiver of your right to a <br />decision by May 19, 2011 and request for additional time. This must be received no later than the <br />deadline date. <br />If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 303-866-3567 Ext. 8124. <br />Sincerel , <br />Peter S. Hay <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Cc: Tony Waldron; Division of Reclamation, Mining & Safety <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.