My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-04-14_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1991078
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1991078
>
2011-04-14_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1991078
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:32:36 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 12:28:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1991078
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/14/2011
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for SL2
From
Phase II for 86.8 acres
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 1994, the Division released $497,226.00 in liability. SL-01 addressed backfilling and <br />grading work conducted over the entire permit area, with the exception of ponds and ditches. The <br />remaining liability was $152,774.00. <br />For Permit Renewal No. 3 (RN-03),. the Division re-calculated the Reclamation Cost Estimate and <br />determined that the amount of bond held was insufficient. Honeywood Coal Company increased <br />the amount of bond to $447,281.00 in March 2007. The current liability at the Hamilton Mine is <br />$439,432.00, as calculated with the 2009 Midterm Review (MT-04). <br />The Division currently holds a performance bond of $447,281.00. Pursuant to Rule 3.03.1(2)(b), <br />"up to eighty-five percent of the applicable bond amount shall be released upon the <br />establishment of vegetation which supports the approved postmining land use and which meets <br />the approved success standard for cover..." Therefore, the Division can release up to 85% of the <br />current liability ($439,432.00), which is $373,517.00. <br />Further, Rule 3.02.2(4), states that "(t)he amount of the performance bond required shall be <br />adjusted for good cause as affected land acreages are increased or decreased or when the cost of <br />future reclamation changes...", the Division can approve a bond reduction in the amount of <br />$7,849.00. This bond adjustment is based on the difference between the current bond held <br />($447,281.00) and the current liability as calculated with MT-04 ($439,432.00). <br />The combination of the Phase Il bond release amount ($373,517.00) and the bond reduction <br />amount ($7,849.00) result in a maximum releasable amount of $381,336.00 for SL-02. The <br />required liability following the approval of SL-2 is 15% of the current liability ($439,432.00), <br />which is $65,915.00. Based on the Division's calculation of the remaining reclamation costs <br />following the approval of SL-02 ($55,226.00), the Division can release $381,366.00. Although <br />the Division will hold more bond ($65,915.00) than the current calculated liability ($55,226.00), <br />this amount is required pursuant to Rule 3.03.1(2)(b). The following chart shows the current <br />bond held, the current liability and the maximum SL-02 releasable amount. <br />Current Bond Held $ 447,281.00 <br />Current Liability (2009 Midterm) $ 439,432.00 <br />Remaining Reclamation Cost Liability $ 55,226.00 <br />SL-02 Proposed Release (85% of Current Liability) $373,517.20 <br />Proposed Bond Reduction (Excess Bond) $7,849.00 <br />Applicant Requested Release Amount $30,000.00 <br /> <br />Statutory Bond Requirement (15%) $65,914.80 <br /> <br />Total Proposed for Release (Releasable + Reduction) $381,366.20 <br />The Division currently holds a performance bond of $447,281.00. Based on the observations above <br />and the findings made in this document, the Division proposes to release $381,366.00. <br />The remaining $65,915.00 is sufficient to assure completion of the remaining reclamation work at <br />the site if the work had to be performed by the Division, including the cost of reestablishing
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.