My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-02-14_PERMIT FILE - C1980007A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2011-02-14_PERMIT FILE - C1980007A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 7:01:03 AM
Creation date
4/14/2011 9:10:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/14/2011
Doc Name
SUBSIDENCE EVALUATION
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 60E Subsidence Evaluation for the South of Divide and Dry Fork Mining Areas
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Subsidence Evaluation for the <br />Exhibit 60E South of Divide and Dry Fork Mining Areas Page 33 <br />depth from 8.4 to 11.2 feet, are projected in this area. Maximum changes in slope (tilt), ranging <br />from 1.3 to 6.4 percent, are also projected for this area. The maximum horizontal tensile and <br />compressive strain is projected to range from 0.7 to 4.2 percent. Subsidence depressions and <br />slope changes will be less above the gate road pillars than above solid coal barriers, because they <br />are projected to yield during mining by as much as 4 feet (Table 2). <br />No subsidence depressions or changes in stream gradient were observed in Deep Creek, located <br />about 1,050 feet above mined B -seam longwall panel 17 during the annual traverse in July 2004 <br />(Dunrud 2004a). There was no observable change in stream gradient or in stream flow. The <br />depression and change in gradient were apparently sufficiently gradual, so as to not be perceived <br />by Dunrud during his traverse along the trail by the stream <br />11.3.1 Potential for Hydraulic Connection Between Mine Workings and Surface <br />Near the southwest corner of E -seam longwall panel E2, the Dry Fork channel encounters a short <br />reach where the E -seam overburden is less than 400 feet, with a minimum of 375 feet. A prudent <br />concern is whether mining induced subsidence could establish a hydraulic connection between <br />the Dry Fork stream channel and the mine workings. To address this scenario, the maximum <br />projected height of fracturing and the maximum depth of surface cracks were considered. As <br />discussed in Section 5.2, the effective height of fracturing in the South of Divide and Dry Fork <br />mining areas is estimated to range from 9t to 18t, or a maximum fracture height of 252 feet for a <br />mining height of 14 feet. However, Peng (1992) states that the upper one -third of the fractured <br />• zone has only minor fractures with little potential for water conductivity. Therefore, the height <br />of the fractured zone capable of transmitting water would be two - thirds of the 18t, or 168 feet. <br />The maximum height of the caved zone is projected to be 5t, or 70 feet, for the South of Divide <br />and Dry Fork mining areas. When added to the effective fracture zone height of 168 feet, the <br />combined heights of the caved and fracture zones capable of transmitting water is projected to be <br />a maximum of 238 feet. <br />As discussed in Section 5.3.2, the maximum crack depth in the South of Divide and Dry Fork <br />mining areas is estimated to be 15 feet in terrains with slopes less than 30 percent, with depths up <br />to 35 feet occurring locally in steep topography. For the Dry Fork channel near the western edge <br />of panel E2, the maximum projected crack depth is 15 feet. Consequently, the combined <br />maximum height of the caved and fractured zones and the maximum crack depth is 253 feet. <br />Even at the minimum overburden thickness of 375 feet, an estimated 122 feet of unfractured <br />bedrock will remain intact. In addition, the presence of soft shales and claystones in the E -seam <br />overburden will increase the�probability that the strata will warp rather than fracture during the <br />subsidence process. <br />11.4 Springs, Water - Bearing Zones, and Ground Water Wells <br />MCC's Spring and Stock Pond Location Map for the South of Divide mining area shows one <br />decreed spring (Spring 21), three springs found flowing at every site visit (in 1975, 1977, 1979, <br />and 1980), thirty -three intermittent springs, and two groundwater wells that are currently <br />monitored. The same map indicated seven perennial springs in the Dry Fork mining area. Only <br />a few springs in the West Elk Mine area indicate a source from a local bedrock water - bearing <br />831 - 032.810 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.