Laserfiche WebLink
Mike Boulay -7- April 11, 2011 <br />consult with the local water commissioner to assure no injury to water <br />rights occur. <br />Please address each of these concerns and provide a response and <br />amended application materials, if appropriate. <br />CAM: Based on the new hydrology design, using BMP's instead of relying solely <br />on sediment ponds, the first two concerns of the SEO are no longer applicable <br />for the majority of the site. There will be two new ponds as shown on Map-16, <br />and CAM will not expose groundwater, nor will long term storage of stormwater <br />runoff be of concern as the pond will be dewatered as outlined in section <br />2.05.3(4). The ponds will be dewatered once the water level is above the <br />maximum sediment level, and/or 48 hours after a precipitation event. The well <br />permit applications have been submitted to the SEO. <br />8. Water Rights locations are shown on Map 18. In accordance with Rule <br />2.04.7(1)(b) please also provide well locations and reported yields from all <br />wells within the proposed permit and adjacent areas which are registered <br />with the Office of the State Engineer. This requirement was not addressed <br />in the application. <br />CAM: Well locations were shown on Map-18, but for clarity, a different symbol <br />and color was given to wells within the permit and adjacent areas; please see <br />revised Map-18. Wells with a yield that are registered with the SEO are now <br />shown on pages 2.04-23 to 2.04-26. <br />9. For clarification of the well completion information provided, please revise the <br />last sentence of the 4th paragraph on page 2.04-14 as follows. "A typical <br />completion diagram along with a summary table of specific completion <br />information for each monitoring well is located in Volume I, Exhibit 3. The <br />As-Built Drawings from 1981 when the wells were drilled and completed are <br />provided in Volume I, Exhibit 14, Appendix A." <br />CAM: Please see revised pages 2.04-14 to 2.04-16 <br />10. Ground surface elevation information for the monitoring wells does not appear to <br />be consistent between the summary table information on the typical diagram in <br />Exhibit 3 as compared with the As-Built Drawings for the well completions <br />provided in Exhibit 14. Have the wells been re-surveyed by CAM? If so, were <br />the ground surface and top of casing elevations surveyed? Please expand the <br />well completion summary table on the typical diagram to include the <br />following: ground surface elevation, top of casing or measuring point <br />elevation, and perforated interval depth.