My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-04-12_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2011-04-12_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:32:32 PM
Creation date
4/12/2011 3:02:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE
Doc Date
4/12/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Responses # 1
From
J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc
To
DRMS
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mike Boulay -11- April 11, 2011 <br />In regard to potential impacts from the Grand Valley Canal, the person who <br />performs the monitoring will indicate when the Canal is flowing. <br />20. There was a water court application submitted by Tavistock Partners LLC to the <br />District Court, Water Division 5 on November 19, 2009 that proposes water <br />diversions for use in the same area as the proposed Fruita Loadout. An amended <br />application was submitted by CAM -Colorado, LLC in September 2010. After <br />reviewing this application it appears that CAM is proposing to divert water for <br />industrial uses on the Fruita Loadout site from both Loma Drain and Reed Wash. <br />This application is still in review with the Division 5 water court. There is no <br />discussion of these diversions in the current application. Please update all <br />appropriate sections of the PAP with this pertinent information including the <br />water rights discussion in Section 2.04.7. <br />This item refers to the last comment in Item 7 above. If construction operations <br />(or any other mining/industrial operations) might impede the flow of water in a <br />stream system CAM should contact the water commissioner to make sure they <br />are not preventing water from reaching downstream diversions. Also, if CAM <br />diverts out of priority they will be subject to administration by the Division of <br />Water Resources. The operation's location makes it unlikely that diversions <br />direct from the Colorado River will be out of priority, but it is a possibility in future <br />years and it is a possibility on Reed Wash and Loma Drain. The local water <br />commissioner contact information is provided in the SEO letter provided in <br />Attachment 2. Please address these concerns and provide a substantive <br />response. <br />CAM: The application your question refers to is Case No. 09CW166, Water <br />Division 5. The application was originally filed by Tavistock Partners LLC in <br />November 2009, but was defective and the court refused to publish it. During <br />CAM's acquisition of the Tavistock properties, their attorney's corrected the <br />defects and filed an amended application during September 2010. It was <br />published by the court, and no opposition was filed. The application claims the <br />right to divert from both Loma Drain and Reed Wash for industrial and other <br />uses, as listed in the application. Tavistock retains a 50% interest in the water <br />rights for its own uses, but CAM is responsible for the application. Please see <br />revised pages 2.04-26 & 27 and Map-18. <br />Rule 2.04.9 Soils Resource Information <br />21. It appears that a 1978 NRCS soil survey was used as the base map for the Exhibit <br />7 baseline soil survey, rather than the current NRCS soil survey for the Mesa <br />County Area, as provided in the USDA Web Soil Survey. Based on the Web Soil
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.