My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-04-08_PERMIT FILE - C1981012A (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2011-04-08_PERMIT FILE - C1981012A (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:32:28 PM
Creation date
4/12/2011 12:45:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/8/2011
Section_Exhibit Name
SECTION 2.04 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR SURFACE OR UNDERGROUND MINING ACTIVITIES
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Average chemical analyses of the Allen, Apache, and Maxwell Seams are provided in Table <br />4A. Average moisture content ranges from 1 to 2% and thermal content ranges from 11,000 to 13,500 <br />Btu/lb. A sulfur form analysis performed on the Allen Seam by Commercial Testing and Engineering <br />in 1981 (Table 5) indicated a total sulfur content of 0.49 %, which consisted of pyritic sulfur of 0.06% <br />and organic sulfur of 0.43 %. Because pyritic sulfur is the species of concern and because it is a <br />relatively small proportion of the total sulfur, sulfur forms do not appear to be a significant <br />environmental concern. <br />Table 4A. Average Chemical Analysis of the Coal Seams (Raw, arb) <br />Seam <br />Volatile Matter <br />Fixed Carbon <br />Ash <br />Sulfur <br />Allen <br />32.0 <br />46.6 <br />18.2 <br />0.47 <br />Apache <br />31.6 <br />50.9 <br />14.6 <br />0.50 <br />Maxwell <br />29.8 <br />42.9 <br />23.8 <br />0.46 <br />An average of 11 analyses of the Allen seam is as follows: <br />Moisture <br />0.7 <br />Ash <br />8.5 <br />Volatile Matter <br />37.8 <br />Sulfur <br />0.49 <br />Fixed carbon <br />53.0 <br />Btu <br />13,740 <br />A sulfur form analysis of the Allen coal seam has been regarded as typical rather than <br />representative, see Table 5, Sulfur Form Analysis. The analysis reflects the dominant organic <br />sulfur species to be the species. Since the product is removed, and the single sample correlates with <br />the historical proximate analyses above, sulfur forms in the product should be of negligible <br />environmental concern. No further analyses are contemplated. <br />No significant aquifers were encountered during previous mining in the New Elk Mine and <br />none are expected in the slopes at the Bates Portal. Although sandstones are a dominant lithology in <br />the mine area and generally are regarded as being significant aquifers, Raton Formation sandstones <br />are clay - filled and usually do not yield water in appreciable quantities. Permeability testing <br />performed reflects the impermeable character of the sandstone units (refer to Page 17 of Exhibit 8 <br />(Hydrology and Geology Information - TR55 Addendum). <br />Given the heterogeneous distribution of the sediments enclosing the coal, Exhibit 9, <br />Overburden and Underburden Analysis, displays a reasonable correlation of chemical risks incident <br />to mining in the separate Allen and Maxwell environments. The Exhibit reflects the geochemical <br />controls of the quality of water developed during mining and demonstrates a buffer capacity sufficient <br />to limit concentrates of trace metals. That point is further confirmed in the characterization of the <br />quality of ground and surface waters presented in Exhibit 8, Hydrology and Geology Information, and <br />the evaluation of subsequent data, Exhibit 10, Water Quality Analysis, collected since the hydrology <br />study was completed. <br />TR -55 2.04 -10 <br />• <br />01/20/11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.