My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-03-14_REVISION - M1977493 (65)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
2011-03-14_REVISION - M1977493 (65)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:47:16 PM
Creation date
4/12/2011 12:35:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/14/2011
Doc Name
Exhibit List, Ex. 70
From
Climax
To
MLRB
Type & Sequence
AM6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CM0001764 <br />Page 10 <br />4.5 Cutoff Wall <br />To minimize seepage under the Dam, a cutoff wall will be extended from the bottom of Zone 1 <br />to the top of competent bedrock, as shown on Figure 5. The specified cutoff wall consists of a 24 <br />inch wide bentonite slurry trench backfilled with a soil-bentonite (S-B) mixture that achieves a <br />permeability of 10-7 cm/sec. <br />Seepage analyses evaluations, summarized in Section 4.9, were performed on two cutoff wall <br />material alternatives extending from the bottom of Zone 1 to the top of competent bedrock. As <br />summarized in Section 4.9, seepage through a 24 inch wide S-B cutoff wall is approximately the <br />same as seepage through a 20 foot wide Mosquito Fault material cutoff wall extending between <br />the Zone 1 and fractured bedrock zones. Cost-benefit evaluations performed for the options <br />indicated that the S-B cutoff wall could be replaced with the Mosquito Fault cutoff wall at less <br />than one tenth the cost. The cost saving is accomplished not only from reduced subcontractor <br />labor and materials costs for slurry wall installation but also by replacing foundation backfill <br />with the Mosquito Fault cutoff wall, effectively providing a foundation and cutoff wall in one 1-0 <br />operation. As with the Zone 1 material, if CMC found the Mosquito Fault material acceptable, <br />than it would be cost effective to replace the 24 inch wide S-B cutoff wall with a 20 foot wide <br />Mosquito Fault cutoff wall while backfilling the foundation excavation. <br />Table 4 identifies that approximately 3,100 cy of soil (i.e., as calculated in the `Summary of <br />Construction Materials Calculation Brief provided in Appendix E) and 250 tons of bentonite <br />will be required to backfill the bentonite slurry trench and construct the slurry wall. <br />4.6 Zone 2 - Outer Core <br />Zone 2 provides support and stability for the Dam. As indicated in Section 4.4, Zone 2 must be <br />more permeable than Zone 1. However, Zone 2 must also include gradation specifications that <br />are compatible (i.e., such that fines do not move between zones effectively weakening the Dam <br />structure) with the Zone 1 gradations. The Zone 2 gradations identified in the Specifications <br />provide a permeability of 10,5 cm/sec and were selected based on laboratory testing of borrow <br />area soils and the filtration criteria evaluation performed in the `Zone Particle Size by Filtration <br />Analysis' calculation brief provided in Appendix E. Table 4 identifies that approximately 11,800 <br />cy of in-place material (as calculated in the `Summary of Construction Materials Calculation <br />c:\nY_,cYruz\a. Mold.m?blb4l;jl-eoc 12107/96 <br />.. ° Environments
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.