My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-03-14_REVISION - M1977493 (57)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
2011-03-14_REVISION - M1977493 (57)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:47:17 PM
Creation date
4/6/2011 8:41:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/14/2011
Doc Name
Exhibit List, Ex. 1-6
From
Climax
To
MLRB
Type & Sequence
AM6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> <br />• <br />Permit Amendment (AM-06) - Climax Mine <br />T-5.4.1 Arkansas River Watershed <br />The mining and crushing/conveying activities that occurred in the Storke Yard area in the past have <br />ceased as the scope and size of operations at Climax have been reduced to mining from the open pit. <br />Closure and reclamation tasks have been completed in the upper Arkansas River watershed. The <br />Arkansas River watershed EPFs are designed to function on a long-term basis, and are not expected to <br />change significantly during final mine closure. <br />The two pumping stations in the Arkansas watershed, per previous discussions, are the critical EPFs in <br />the watershed. Both are active, as they directly contain and control impacted waters. The Storke <br />Wastewater Pump Station has been operational for approximately 30 years without major problems or <br />releases. The 5-Shaft Pump Station, although only operational since 1996, has performed as expected <br />without release of impacted mine water. Prior to startup of the 5-Shaft Pump Station, the underground <br />mine workings were dewatered by other pump systems (i.e. 629), thereby establishing a long history of <br />environmental protection in the Arkansas River watershed. <br />T-5.4.2 Eagle River Watershed <br />As with the EPFs throughout the Climax Mine site, those in the upper Eagle River watershed have been <br />highly effective in containing and controlling the release of potential contaminants during the recent <br />history of the mine. The primary EPFs in the watershed are the Robinson Lake (and dam), the Robinson <br />Lake Pump Station, and the associated seep collection and return system below Robinson Lake. <br />Robinson Lake functions as a process water and seepage containment, storage and return system. The <br />Robinson Lake Pump Station will return process waters directly to the process water tank for the mill. <br />Because the integrity of this collection and return system is essential to production of molybdenum <br />concentrates, close observation of its operation and maintenance of the systems is a priority. <br />The 4 Dam and Robinson Dam seepage collection and pump systems will remain in place and fully <br />functional until such time as seepage from the dam meets water quality standards for this segment of the <br />Eagle River. <br />The 1 Dam EPF has been effective in controlling the release of tailing material from the TSF. The <br />regrading, capping, and reclamation of this dam (Section T-5.2.2) have increased its present and future <br />effectiveness. <br />T-5.4.3 Tenmile Creek Watershed <br />CM0000493 <br />EPFs in the critical Tenmile Creek watershed have been, and continue to be, extremely effective in <br />containing and controlling contaminants and preventing contaminant release into the environment. As the <br />EPFs essentially function in series from the top of the watershed, the effectiveness of the system is <br />increased through the redundancy or secondary containment afforded by this arrangement. Each EPF <br />serves as a protective layer for up-gradient EPFs. However, it must again be emphasized that the upper <br />Tenmile Creek watershed has been significantly impacted by historic placer and lode mining, milling and <br />smelting activities, which peaked in the 1880s. Prior to construction of the Mayflower TSF and the <br />Interceptor System, impacted waters and significant loads of contaminated sediments from these non- <br />Climax historic operations entered Tenmile Creek and were transported downstream. <br />The Climax water treatment and discharge system, which treats large volumes of water, has an <br />exemplary track record. The treated discharge at Outfall 001 has met effluent limitations contained in the <br />permit and has passed Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) tests. Unlike other more complex and technically <br />complicated water treatment processes, utilizing the first and second stage treatment processes of the <br />SDP and the TSFs for lime precipitation is a simple and effective means of treatment. If a problem were <br />to occur upstream, the decant system on the Mayflower TSF can be managed to increase retention time, <br />thus allowing time ensure treatment process control and discharge. <br />The sulfuric acid tank is 120 percent contained within a series of sumps, and both primary and secondary <br />containment. The EPFs that control and contain the water treatment chemicals, as with the process <br />water and tailing circuit, have a proven track record for effectiveness at the Climax Mine. As discussed in <br />Section T-5.3.2 and in the SPCC/MCP, water treatment chemicals have primary and secondary <br />Exhibit T <br />T-21 <br />May 2010
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.