Laserfiche WebLink
CLIMAX PRE-HEARING STATEMENT <br />AM-06 APPLICATION, PERMIT NO. M-1977-493 <br />MARCH 31, 2011 <br />and engineering activities to ensure the permit documentation contains all <br />required and relevant information needed to attain continued exceptional <br />performance in reclamation of non-essential facilities and assure <br />compliance during ongoing maintenance pending construction and future <br />production operations.5 <br />The Objectors each filed timely comment letters seeking party status. <br />Although the purpose of the application was to increase the acreage of affected <br />lands by restoring it to the pre-1989 boundary (with some minor differences), Climax <br />provided a comprehensive permit document in its AM-06 application. Climax was not <br />required to do so. See Rule 1.10(1), Mineral Rules and Regulations of the Colorado <br />Mined Land Reclamation Board for Hard Rock, Metal and Designated Mining <br />Operations (the "Hard Rock/Metal Mining Rules" or the "Rules"). Climax's permit, <br />originally approved in 1977, has been amended five times, and Climax has sought 17 TRs <br />to the permit. The original application, the amendments, the approved technical <br />revisions, and other communications with, and approvals by, the Division and the Board, <br />all work together to constitute Climax's permit. Although such detail is not required by <br />the scope of the application, Climax chose to present the exhibits to the Division to <br />provide a comprehensive compendium of all current information in the suite of <br />documents that constitutes the M-1977-493 permit. <br />The Division completed its Rule 1.4.1 adequacy review and, on November 10, <br />2010 informed Climax that "[i]n general the application was substantially adequate; <br />however, as with most applications there are a few items which will require clarification <br />of the existing information."6 Regarding the mining plan, reclamation plan, and water <br />information exhibits, the Division had only a few limited questions.7 Regarding the EPP <br />exhibit, the Division acknowledged that "the comprehensive Water Quality Monitoring <br />Plan is currently being generated by the Operator and will be submitted under separate <br />cover for Division approval as specified in TR-08. This document shall be submitted and <br />approved by the Division before mining resumes at the site or within 365 days of <br />approval of AM-06."8 The Division also identified other questions with the EPP exhibit <br />in its adequacy review. <br />Before Climax responded in writing to the Division's adequacy review, Climax <br />representatives met with Division staff to discuss the Division's questions about the <br />5 Ex. 83, AM-06 proof of publication (emphasis added). <br />6 Ex. 6, 11/10/10 ltr from Division to Climax re: Preliminary Review of a 112d Metals Reclamation Permit <br />Amendment Application Package AM-06, Climax Mine, Permit No. M-1977-493, at 1, CM0000629. <br />7 See id. at 2-5, CM0000630-633. <br />'Id. at 8, CMC000636. <br />5