My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-03-31_REVISION - M1977493
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
2011-03-31_REVISION - M1977493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:47:18 PM
Creation date
4/1/2011 12:23:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/31/2011
Doc Name
Objectors' Prehearing Statement
From
Objectors
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM6
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Both the Operator and parties will be notified of the Division's decision to approve or <br />deny the TR through the standard revision decision letter. if the Operator and/or parties <br />wish to object to the final determination of the Division with regards to the TR, they must <br />submit a petition for a MLRB hearing pursuant to section 1.4.11 of the Rule. At that <br />point a Formal Public Hearing will be convened to allow the Board to consider the merits <br />of the Technical Revision, and to hear testimony from the objecting parties. <br />2) A revised Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) will be submitted for Division review and <br />approval which satisfies the requirements of Section 6.4.21 of the Hard Rock/Metal Mining <br />Rule. This plan will be incorporated into the permit through a technical revision (TR) process <br />that will assure opportunity for meaningful participation by parties identified at the AM-06 pre- <br />hearing conference. <br />The Division acknowledges that the EPP for any site should be a living document that may be <br />modified and improved as needed through the life of the permit through the Technical Revision <br />process to insure adequate protections. However, the Operator shall make all attempts to provide <br />a complete EPP for the proposed operation based on the conditions and operations contained and <br />proposed in AM06 at this time. <br />Until this TR is approved by the Division for incorporation into the permit, the Operator is <br />precluded from placing additional tailings into the TSFs or operation of the milling facility at a <br />scale greater than what would be required to determine if the system is operational, or any other <br />previously unpermitted activities which may pose an additional risk to prevailing conditions, <br />including quality and quantity, in Eagle Park or Clinton Reservoirs. Normal site construction <br />activities as currently permitted or included in AM-06, ongoing site maintenance, water <br />treatment, and reclamation will be allowed to continue. The technical revision process to be <br />employed will adhere to the following steps: <br />When the Operator applies for the Revised EPP TR, they will concurrently provide <br />complete copies to the identified parties for technical review and comment. The Operator <br />will also waive the requirement that the Division must act on the TR within 30 days to <br />allow sufficient time for review, comment, and any required modifications. Party <br />technical comments to the TR will be submitted to the Division for consideration within <br />30 days of receipt of the TR. The Division will review the TR, review and consider all <br />technical comments submitted, and determine the final composition of the Revision to be <br />approved and incorporated into the permit. The Division will act on the submittal within <br />60 days. <br />Both the Operator and parties will be notified of the Division's decision to approve or <br />deny the TR through the standard revision decision letter. If the Operator and/or parties <br />wish to object to the final determination of the Division with regards to the TR, they must <br />submit a petition for a MLRB hearing pursuant to section 1.4.11 of the Rule. At that <br />point, a Formal Public Hearing will be convened to allow the Board to consider the <br />merits of the Technical Revision, and to hear testimony from the objecting parties.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.