My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-03-30_REPORT - C1980005 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980005
>
2011-03-30_REPORT - C1980005 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:32:09 PM
Creation date
3/30/2011 1:01:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/30/2011
Doc Name
2010 Revegetation Report Part 2
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• seed mixes as such. The taxonomic treatment of Weber and Wittmann (1996) places Poa ampla <br />(as well as Poa sandbergii) with Poa secunda. Despite this merger, the distinctness of Poa <br />• <br />ampla is worth noting. <br />Photographic Record <br />Within each reclamation and reference area, representative color photographs were taken to <br />document the appearance of the vegetation in 2010 (Appendix 4). Within each reclaimed area <br />photograph, a placard identifies the particular area and sample. <br />Statistical Methods <br />Sampling was conducted at randomly located sites. Random map points for sampling locations <br />were generated randomly using ESRI ArcMap 9.3 software and Hawth's Analysis Tools for <br />ArcGIS (Beyer 2004). Garmin GPS60 units (accuracy to 3 m) and topographic maps were used in <br />the field to locate random points. Cover transects were randomly oriented. At each cover /woody <br />plant density sampling location, the slope, expressed as a percent, and aspect of the site, in <br />degrees not corrected for magnetic declination, were determined and recorded, as was the <br />orientation of the transect. <br />GENERAL <br />Assessment of Reclamation Adequacy <br />Formal (statistical) hypothesis testing (see below) was undertaken for the Phase II Bond Release <br />Block. <br />SAMPLE ADEQUACY DETERMINATION <br />Sample adequacy was evaluated based on total allowable live herbaceous cover by vascular <br />plants using the following expression: <br />t <br />n,, = (d - x 2 � <br />where: <br />n,„ = minimum sample size <br />s = Sample variance (n -1 degrees of freedom) <br />d = Precision (0.10 for cover and production; 0.15 for <br />woody plant density) <br />0 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.