My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-01-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - P2008043 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Prospect
>
P2008043
>
2011-01-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - P2008043 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:25 PM
Creation date
3/29/2011 8:15:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
P2008043
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
1/3/2011
Doc Name
Petition For Review Of UIC Permit- 2.
From
Coloradoans Against Resources Destruction
To
EPA
Permit Index Doc Type
Gen. Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
§ 146.10(b) specifies that the dump bailer method, the balance method, or.the two plug method be <br />used to plug a well. These practices represent existing methods employed that have proved <br />effective in a wide range of application." <br />With respect to Class IV wells, traditional methods of abandonment, such as plugging, <br />may be inappropriate due to the crude construction of the well. In such a case, the only <br />abandonment requirements might simply be closure of the well. <br />MONITORING FREQUENCIES <br />The regulations also require various kinds of monitoring." Monitoring can provide an <br />early warning of potential serious degradation of underground sources of drinking water. <br />Wells in Classes I, II, and Ill share common monitoring requirements. Injection fluids <br />must be tested with sufficient frequency to field data representative of fluid characteristics. <br />Information of this sort is essential for the Director to understand the operation of a particular <br />well. Such information serves the important function of providing basic knowledge of enabling <br />Directors to analyze reasons for well failures, to establish appropriate remedies to correct them <br />and to assess any endangerment the failures might cause. <br />The regulations also require monitoring of operating characteristics of wells in Classes I, <br />II, and IlI. Class I and III wells must have continuous recording devices to monitor injection <br />pressure, flow rate, and volume of injection fluids 52 Continuous monitoring is appropriate <br />because fluids injected by Class I and III wells are usually more corrosive and hazardous than are <br />fluids injected by others. These fluid properties increase the risk of serious well leaks or failures. <br />Continuous monitoring, furthermore, is a common practice for these wells, in part because they <br />often inject fluids in uninterrupted streams. <br />Class I wells must comply with the additional requirement of continuously monitoring the <br />pressure in the annulus of the well between the tubing and the long string. The "long string" is <br />the casing which extends from the ground surface to the injection zone. Wells in Class III which <br />may require the use of the annulus for injection, need not meet this requirement since, when the <br />annulus is employed for injection, pressure measurements reflect injection pressure. <br />So Development of Procedures and Costs for Proper Abandonment and Plugging of <br />Injection Wells. <br />" §§146.13; 146.23; and 146.33. <br />52 §§146.13(b)(2); and 146.33(b)(2). <br />Page 18 of 20
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.