My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-01-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - P2008043 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Prospect
>
P2008043
>
2011-01-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - P2008043 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:25 PM
Creation date
3/29/2011 8:15:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
P2008043
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
1/3/2011
Doc Name
Petition For Review of UIC Permit- 1.
From
Coloradoans Against Resource Destruction
To
EPA
Permit Index Doc Type
Gen. Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
wells screened in the Laramie Formation sandstone do not penetrate the confinement zone <br />separating the Laramie and Fox Hills Formations. <br />4. Comments related to the concern that the EPA has obtained insufficient information to <br />issue a final permit that is protective of underground sources of drinking water. There were <br />several comments requesting that EPA obtain more information before making a decision on the <br />final permit. Commenters believe that the EPA should acquire more information about: A) the <br />extent of the area within the A2 sandstone aquifer expected to be affected by the injection <br />activity, B) the water quality of the A2 sandstone aquifer and the injectate, C) the geology of the <br />injection interval confinement zones, D) the location of screened intervals in a private drinking <br />water well, which is located one mile away from the proposed injection well, relative to the <br />elevation of the injection formation, and E) the previous aquifer tests Powertech has conducted <br />at the Centennial site. Commenters questioned whether the groundwater flow was characterized <br />in the area (included in part F of this section). <br />Page 9 of 24
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.