My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-01-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - P2008043 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Prospect
>
P2008043
>
2011-01-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - P2008043 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:25 PM
Creation date
3/29/2011 8:15:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
P2008043
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
1/3/2011
Doc Name
Petition For Review of UIC Permit- 1.
From
Coloradoans Against Resource Destruction
To
EPA
Permit Index Doc Type
Gen. Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TABLE OF CONTENTS <br />LIST OF EXHIBITS .................................................................................................... 3 <br />TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................................................................... 4 <br />INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 6 <br />ISSUES ON WHICH REVIEW IS SOUGHT ............................................................ 8 <br />1. EPA failed to require submittal, or to conduct any review of, <br />relevant information from previous aquifer-pump tests upon <br />which EPA based its decision to issue the permit ................................ 8 <br />II. EPA failed to require submittal, or to conduct any review of, <br />relevant information regarding the existence and condition of <br />historic bore-hole drilling in the vicinity of the proposed <br />injection well .......................................................................................... 12 <br />III. This case presents substantial policy issues that warrant review........ 17 <br />CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................ 18 <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.