My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-03-14_PERMIT FILE - M2010084
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2010084
>
2011-03-14_PERMIT FILE - M2010084
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:31:41 PM
Creation date
3/28/2011 11:16:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2010084
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
3/14/2011
Doc Name
Comments
From
Roberta Tabor
To
DRMS
Email Name
DMC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Dustin Czapla <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />-, 02A <br />March 3, 2011 <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />j? Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />101 South 3`d, Suite 301 <br />Grand Junction, CO 81501 <br />RECEIVED <br />MAR 212011 <br />Dlvislon of Reclamation, <br />Mining & Safety <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br />MAR 14 2011 <br />"'W JUNCTION FIELD QFF <br />RECLgM,q? N M NI G 3AFM <br />Re: Lost Cause Pond, Permit/File No. M-2010-084, Comments Regarding 110c application <br />Dear Mr. Czapla: <br />In regard to your letter dated February 24, 2011, in which Nathan Green from the U.S. Army <br />Corp of Engineers responded to a letter from you, please find the following answers. <br />Mr. Green stated that "it appears that there are waters of the United States present within the <br />Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 98 West. However, the attached map was not detailed enough for <br />me to determine whether or not the project will impact them or not. Specifically, Eureka Creek is likely <br />considered to be a water of the United States. It is also possible that there are wetlands associated with <br />the creek or any seeps or springs within the project area." <br />It should be notated Eureka Creek drainage is a dry drainage. Only when there is <br />unusually sudden thawing of snows or an occasional severe thunderstorm/cloudburst <br />during summer does the drainage contain any water if it is not already soaked up by the <br />dry vegetation and natural landscape, which is why siltisediment has been deposited / <br />captured in the stock water pond. <br />As observed by you and I in your office at the end of January 2011, in which we <br />looked up the coordinates on Google Earth, it was easy to see that the natural vegetation <br />is dry consisting of native grasses, rangeland shrubs, predominately rabbit brush and sage <br />brush which is reflective of the fact that this is a natural, dry terrain and that any water <br />flow is purely seasonal and not abundant. <br />Please note that there are not any wetlands, seeps or springs directly within the <br />project area. This is a very dry drainage region and as notated in the application 6.3.2(c), <br />"any/all rainfall within the disturbed area will permeate into the soil, or if in excess, will <br />run into the pond. The water flowing into the pond from Eureka Creek and Little Side <br />Gulch is of seasonal flow. " Not to mention the factor of evaporation that occurs. <br />Mr. Green also stated, "If this project may result in any discharge (placement) of dredged or fill <br />material within any waters of the United States, it is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a Department <br />of the Army 404 permit. " <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.