My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-03-16_REPORT - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2011-03-16_REPORT - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:31:47 PM
Creation date
3/23/2011 1:26:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/16/2011
Doc Name
2009 & 2010 ARR Review Letter
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Coal Company
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
SGR
SB1
SLB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />COLORADO <br />D IV IS I ON OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />March 16, 2011 <br /> <br />Roy A. Karo John W. Hickenlooper <br />Governor <br />Reclamation Manager Mike King <br /> <br />Seneca Coal Company Executive Director <br /> <br />P.O. BOX 670 Loretta E. Pineda <br /> Director <br />Hayden, CO 81639 <br />Re: Annual Reclamation Reports for 2009 and 2010 <br />Seneca II-W Mine Permit C-1982-057 <br />The Division has reviewed the 2009 and 2010 ARR reports submitted by Seneca Coal Company. The <br />2009 ARR was received on March 19, 2010 and the 2010 ARR was received on March 09, 2011 and <br />contains information on revegetation, weed control and wildlife monitoring. The reports were filed in a <br />timely manner, and were thorough and comprehensive. <br />The Division has the following comments and questions as a result of the review. <br />1. 2009 ARR tables 09.5 and 09.3 do not match the seed tags submitted. Specifically, <br />Mountain Snowberry is missing from the interseed seed tag and Woods Rose is missing <br />from the drainage/riparian seed tag. Please verify why these seeds are not listed on the <br />seed tags and how they deviate from the approved seed mixes outlined in the permit. <br />2. The P.L.S. drill rates on the seed tags do not match the approved P.L.S. drill rates in <br />Tables 09.3, 09.5 and 09.2. Please explain the differences between the approved drill <br />rates in the permit versus the drill rates listed in the seed tags. <br />If you have additional comments or questions, please feel free to call me. <br />Sincerely, <br />Stephanie Reigh <br />C: Sandy Brown <br />Susan Burgmaier <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.