My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-03-17_PERMIT FILE - M2010071
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2010071
>
2011-03-17_PERMIT FILE - M2010071
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:31:49 PM
Creation date
3/21/2011 7:54:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2010071
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
3/17/2011
Doc Name
MEMO- Revised Slope Stabilty Analyses Review
From
DRMS-tc1
To
DRMS-mac
Email Name
MAC
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />To: Michael Cunningham, <br />From: Tim Cazier, P.E. <br />Date: March 17, 2011 <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S I ON OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />John W. Hickenlooper <br />Governor <br />Mike King <br />Executive Director <br />Loretta Pineda <br />Director <br />Re: Revised Slope Stability Analyses Review for Goose Haven Reservoir No. 2, <br />Permit No. M-2010-071 <br />The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety engineering staff (DRMS) have reviewed the <br />revised Slope Stability analyses submitted with the February 28, 2011 permit application for the <br />Goose Haven Reservoir No. 2, Boulder County, Colorado prepared by the City of Lafayette. <br />The review consisted of comparing the revised application content with comments provided by <br />DRMS in the initial memorandum, dated February 4, 2011. While DRMS noted some minor <br />errors and discrepancies: 1) the crest elevation is mislabeled as "EL. 5,055" instead of 5,071 on <br />Figures C-12 through C-C-16; and 2) it is unclear whether a density of 142 pcf (Figure C-1) or <br />145 pcf (Figure C-22) was used to represent bedrock density in the models, these are not <br />expected to yield any meaningful differences in the results of the current analyses. Therefore, <br />based on information provided in the revised package on February 28, 2011, and the subject <br />stability analyses results, DRMS has determined the mine slopes proposed for the Goose Haven <br />Reservoir No. 2 should be adequately stable and are protective of nearby infrastructure (e.g., <br />ditches and power lines) and can be approved pursuant to Rule 6.5. <br /> <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.