My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-11-16_PERMIT FILE - C1996083A (24)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996083A
>
2010-11-16_PERMIT FILE - C1996083A (24)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:27:00 PM
Creation date
3/17/2011 4:38:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/16/2010
Doc Name
pages 2.05-84 to 2.05-165
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plans Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(3) Protection of Hydrologic Balance <br />The applicant has prepared a drainage and sediment control system which <br />will minimize changes to the surface water and to the prevailing hydrologic <br />balance in the facilities area by detaining run -off in sediment ponds or <br />treating runoff with alternative sedimentation control. The sediment ponds <br />are designed to contain the run -off from the 10 year precipitation event. The <br />sedimentation control plan is presented in Volume III, Exhibit 8, and on Maps <br />20, 21 -1, 21 -2, 21 -3, 21 -4, 22 -13, 22 -C, 22J, 35, 36, 36a and Volume IV. <br />There is very little if any beneficial use made of surface run -off from the <br />ephemeral drainages in the permit and adjacent areas. These ephemeral <br />drainages typically only flow during spring snowmelt and significant <br />precipitation events. Sediment ponds B & C should alleviate the problem of <br />the ditches (Deer Trail Ditch & Fire Mountain Canal) plugging with sediment <br />and /or completely washing out do to previously uncontrolled runoff events. <br />• <br />• <br />The construction of mine entries, ventilation shafts and the mining of the coal <br />could cause water to move from formations above the coal seam into the <br />mine. This potential water migration would be magnified by roof collapse <br />and fracturing caused by subsidence. Although the permeability of the coal <br />seam and surrounding strata is low and the quantity of water stored in the <br />formation is also low, some water will occasionally seep into the mine. <br />The Freeman Gulch vent shaft was raise bored to an 8 -foot diameter. The <br />shaft was lined with a 6 -foot diameter steel casing. The steel casing was <br />grouted through the water bearing zone which is approximately 0 to 140 feet <br />deep. The grout liner through this zone is approximately 1 -foot thick. To <br />prevent surface drainage from entering the shaft, the steel liner was <br />extended at least 3 -feet above the ground surface (see Map 35). A screen <br />was placed on the top of the steel liner. The Freeman Gulch shaft has been <br />backfilled a capped with concrete. This backfill will protect the integrity of <br />the grouted liner to contain the water bearing zone. The concrete cap will <br />ensure no surface run -off will enter the backfilled shaft. Thus, the shaft <br />backfill and concrete shaft will protect the hydrologic balance. <br />The Hubbard Creek vent shaft was blind drilled to a 14 -foot finished <br />diameter. The shaft was steel lined to a finished diameter of 12 -feet. The <br />500 foot deep shaft was grouted through water bearing zones. To prevent <br />surface drainage from entering the shaft, the concrete collar was extended <br />above the ground surface. During idle periods, a screen is placed on the top <br />of the concrete shaft. Because of the method of shaft construction, there <br />was no measurable water inflow during shaft construction. The pre - grouting <br />PR -12 2.05-100 06/10 <br />A PPRov6 -b <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.