Laserfiche WebLink
u <br />HABITAT DESCRIPTION, WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS & <br />RECOMMENDATIONS (Numbers refer to the yellow dots on Map 1). <br />1. This is the western start of the project and begins north of the State Highway 133 <br />overpass of the railroad line (line) approximately 1/2 mile east of the intersection of the <br />old and new Highway 133. The Siding begins along a steep hillside fenced on the west <br />by an 8-foot high game damage fence and drops off into a wetland on the eastern side. <br />Boxelder, narrow-leaf and Fremont cottonwood, Gambel oakbrush, rabbitbrush, sumac, <br />yellow sweetclover, coyote willow and saltgrass aze the dominant vegetative species. <br />Most shrub species occur along the line corridor while the tree species dominate the <br />hillsides between the line and wetlands to the east. Below the line to the east -ies a <br />wetland, dominated by cattails, bullrush, sedges and rushes and some coyote willow. <br />Approximately half the wetland is open water. Extensive livestock grazing occurs <br />azound the wetland. Cowbirds, brewers and redwing blackbirds, robins, magpies, mallard <br />ducks and yellow warblers were observed in this area. Utilization of shrubs by mule deer <br />and elk was found in this area and along the entire survey corridor. The North Fork <br />Valley is historic critical winter range for deer and elk. <br />• Recommendations: This initial recommendation holds for the entire corridor. <br />Construction activities should be contained to the azea west and north of the existing line. <br />This is the best azea for minimizing construction impacts on wildlife based on <br />topography, ease of consttuctioq cost of construction and the amount of open fields to <br />work with. The area west of number 1 has minimal vegetation on it compared to the area <br />to the east. The dense vegetation east and south of the existing line serves as an excellent <br />buffer zone between the riparian/wetland habitats, homes and livestock azeas. Every <br />effort should be made to leave this vegetation, along with the existing berm along the <br />south side of the line, totally intact. It represents a major mitigation measure by buffering <br />important wildlife habitats to the south closer to the floodplain. <br />2. Site 2 is at the corner of the line's northeasterly turn. The existing line is in a cut and <br />bermed on the south. There is heavy vegetation on both sides, including cottonwoods, <br />boxelders, sumac and mountain mahogany. Yeliow wazblers, magpies and robins were <br />abundant in this azea. Chorus frogs were heazd in the wetland azeas below the hill. <br />Recommendations: The mature trees on the north side of the track will be impacted by <br />the new Siding. There are few alternatives to tree removal at this location. Planting <br />cottonwoods, sumac and mountain mahogany along the north side of the new siding <br />should be done during reclamation. This will provide important wildlife habitat and <br />buffer the noise and sight of the siding. A vegetative buffer along the entire corridor is an <br />important mitigative measure. The placement of irrigation tailwater collection ditches in <br />i~',r yip'~'L9`i~'1.'di~WliSi-0'iit~idiiiiidi~i~~dtTiaiKTu 8~5Yi ~idiu'~3i i~3iL1~3.~~L'17 Y'1 v~~S.~~S hi <br />addition to protecting the siding from irrigation and natural run-off. <br />