Laserfiche WebLink
~' to adversely affect tt <br />understanding that tt <br />9n the estimated net <br />consultations for the <br />2004, as outlined in ; <br />Endangered Fish Spi <br />reasonable and prude <br />caused depletions. <br />Regarding the bald t <br />for the species, and <br />Wildlife (CDOW). <br />proposed project are <br />foraging for prey coy <br />that could provide h <br />river bottom away fi <br />River, the BA deterr <br />also determined that <br />refuse conveyor or v <br />concluded that the p~ <br />species. Based on th <br />"may affect, but not <br />The Service decisio <br />new information be <br />the total average am <br />element changes wb <br />correspondence and <br />extent not considere <br />OSM should conditi <br />need to be reinitiate <br />If the Service can be <br />address or (970) 243• <br />~e federally listed, endangered fishes or their habitats. It is our <br />action proposed at this time involves no increase (rather, a slight decrease) <br />Waal water depletion to the Upper Colorado River Basin. Prior <br />+pletions at the Bowie No. 2 Mine occurred in 1999, 2001, 2003, and <br />ur letter. Therefore, the existing Recovery Impl<~:mentation Program for <br />les in the Upper Colorado River Basin will continue to serve as the <br />~ alternative to avoid jeopardy to the endangered fishes by the project- <br />gle, the proposed, new refuse disposal site lies wittun winter foraging range <br />ithin a major concentration area mapped by the Ci~lorado Division of <br />DOW has mapped a bald eagle roost site within a~ quarter mile of the <br />along the North Fork of the Gunnison River. Analysis in the BA indicates <br />d occur in the project area, which contains several old cottonwood trees <br />sting perches; however, due to abundant, addition+il foraging habitat in the <br />m the project area, along several miles of the Notch Fork of the Gunnison <br />Wed that foraging in the project area would likely Abe infrequent. The BA <br />small potential exists for bald eagle collisions with the proposed overhead <br />h power lines and poles at the mine. Based on this information, OSM <br />jest `4nay affect" the bald eagle, but is "not likely to adversely affect" the <br />information provided in your analysis, the Service concurs with your <br />rely to adversely affect" determination for the band eagle. <br />in this document are based on the information provided by the OSM. If <br />Wes available, if a new species becomes listed, if;incidental take occurs, if <br />it amount of water depleted by this project change, or if any other project <br />t alters the operation of the project finm that whi%h is described in your <br />'.rich may affect any endangered or threatened species in a manner or to an <br />n this biological opinion, section 7 consultation should be reinitiated. 11te <br />its approval documents to retain jurisdiction shoxild section 7 consultation <br />further assistance, please wntact Larry Thompsiin at the letterhead <br />78, extension 39. <br /> <br />• <br /> <br />