My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-12-11_PERMIT FILE - C1980005 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980005
>
2001-12-11_PERMIT FILE - C1980005 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:18:33 PM
Creation date
3/15/2011 12:40:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 10 BASELINE VEGETATION STUDIES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SHRUB AND TREE AGE <br />~~ The principal objective of tree and shrub aging studies undertaken at <br />Seneca II Mine was to provide baseline data descriptive of the vegetation <br />resouroe on the stay area consistent with .recomrendations set forth <br />by the National Environ*;ental Policy Act (1369). A secondary objective <br />of such studies is to provide some insight regarding past land use on the <br />study area. For example, if large homogeneous blocks of young-age shrubs <br />and trees were encountered in certain areas, an observer could conclude <br />that some type of perturbation had occurred in the past. These data, <br />if significantly different from one site to another (coRgaring the same <br />shrub and tree species), would stimulate the observer to search for and <br />identify evidence of past land uses (timber harvest, overgrazing, land <br />clearing for cultivation, etc.} or disturbances (fire, land slide, <br />avalanche, etc.) which would explain shrub and tree age data differences <br />from site to site. Tree and shrub age data gathered at various sites <br />at Seneca II Mine did not differ sufficiently (i.e., no exceptionally <br />young stands were encountered) to suggest that land use or other <br />~• disturbances have significantly influenced the vegetation in the past <br />25-30 years. The primary land uses in this area for at least the past <br />30 years have been cattle grazing, wildlife use, and mining. Cattle <br />grazing and wildlife use have not significantly influenced the natural <br />aging process of trees and shrubs in the study area. Mining has <br />removed trees and shrubs but since mining is a relatively recent event <br />(in terms of land use), large areas of trees and shrubs have not yet <br />been successfully established. Natural succession within the aspen <br />subtype produces stands of varying age but these age differences are not <br />so clearly related to land use as they are to natural forces. <br />Tree size and age data are shown for aspen in Tables 6 and 7 while <br />shrub height and age data are presented for sagebrush, Gambol oak, <br />serviceberry, chokecherry and snowberry in Tables 8-12, respectively. <br />A straight linear regression of age on size was performed for the <br />species above. The results of these regression analyses are summarized <br />in the above tables. A nndel for the relationship totween size and age <br />(• is given by the formula: <br />-36- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.