My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-03-09_REVISION - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2011-03-09_REVISION - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:31:36 PM
Creation date
3/10/2011 7:57:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/9/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Response Review
From
Janet Binns
To
Marcia Talvitie
Type & Sequence
SL12
Email Name
JHB
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
New Horizon C1981-008: SL12 3 <br />March 9, 2011 <br />b) The Division had requested that WF-C revise Table 1, 2007 sampling results of Irrigated <br />pasture reclaimed area and Irrigated Pasture reference area. WF-C provided a revised Table <br />1 that is clear and provides the requested information. <br />c) The operator adequately corrected the Table 1 values as requested. <br />d) The specified paragraph was eliminated from the application as requested by the Division. <br />This response is adequate. <br />e) WF-C has incorporated the Division's suggestion to clarify the reclamation success <br />discussion in the bond release application and refers the reader to Appendix B, page 10, for a <br />detailed discussion of the comparison. This response is acceptable. <br />9. The Division's May 26, 2010 preliminary adequacy requested a "narrative summary of the <br />reclamation and management history of the parcels included in the Phase III release request, <br />including narrative addressing achievement of the approved post-mining land uses." <br />WF-C provided a description of the reclamation history but chose not to include any discussion <br />of the management history. Was the Irrigated Pasture grazed? Was there any irrigation <br />conducted? If so, what method of irrigation was employed? How often was it irrigated? How <br />much water was applied? Was the pasture cut for hay? How was the Dryland pasture managed? <br />Was the pasture interseeded during the liability period? Was there any fertilization on either the <br />reclaimed areas or the reference areas? WF-C did include a very brief discussion regarding <br />noxious weed management. Please provide the Division with a narrative of the management of <br />the two reclamation blocks; Irrigated pasture and Dryland pasture. Were the reclaimed areas <br />managed in accordance with the approved permit and WF-C needs to describe how they were <br />managed. Please, also, include information, as approved in the permit, regarding the reclamation <br />standards. Section 2.05.4(2)(e) of the permit defines the reclamation success requirements. <br />Please include this detail in the application. <br />10. Summary tables have been included for the Phase III bond release blocks for 2007 and 2008 <br />sampling events. <br />11. The appropriate corrections were made to the t-test formula and reclamation success statistical <br />analysis was recalculated correctly. WF-C corrected the appropriate tables with the corrected <br />values. This response is acceptable. <br />To summarize, items that still need additional responses from the operator include 3.c), 5, 8, and 9.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.