My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-02-15_REVISION - C1980004 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2011-02-15_REVISION - C1980004 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:31:02 PM
Creation date
3/7/2011 2:06:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/15/2011
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
McClane Canyon Mining, LLC
Type & Sequence
PR2
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Corey Heaps <br />McClane Canyon Mining, LLC <br />February 15, 2011 Page 3 <br />8. Table 2.1 -3 Surface Drilling Results needs to be updated with all pertinent drillhole information <br />for the McClane Canyon Mine. For example, there are drill holes shown on Figure 2.1 -3 <br />Cameo Seam Outcrop & Drillhole Index Map that are not in Table 2.1 -3. <br />9. Figure 2.5 -1, Surface Geology needs to be updated with additional required information for the <br />permit expansion area. In accordance with 2.04.6 (3)(a)(ii) please provide a geologic map with <br />geologic cross sections of the proposed permit are, including coal crop lines and the strike and <br />dip of the coal to be mined. The geologic cross sections (Figures 2.5 -2 through 2.5 -6) also <br />need to be revised to include the permit expansion area. The cross sections should be <br />referenced to the geologic map and the cross sections lines need to be shown on the geologic <br />map. <br />Rule 2.04.7 Hydrology Description <br />10. Please refer to the enclosed comment letter from the Division of Water Resources, Office of the <br />State Engineer (SEO) dated December 10, 2010 (see Attachment 4). The SEO has identified <br />several concerns with the proposed project as summarized below. <br />• If the stream system at this location becomes overappropriated, the storage and use of any <br />surface or ground water would be subject to administration. <br />• If any of the sediment ponds expose groundwater, the pond must be backfilled <br />immediately until a well permit issued pursuant to CRS 37- 90- 137(2), allowing the <br />exposure of groundwater in a pit is obtained from the State Engineer. <br />• The SEO has no records of permits for the existing monitoring wells on site. As stated in <br />the SEO's letter, if these wells were completed without a valid monitoring hole notice or <br />well permit the applicant needs to take immediate action to plug or permit the wells. <br />• Last, the SEO notes that the applicant states that portions of the site may affect current <br />surface water diversions. If at any point the applicant's operations will affect surface <br />diversions they should consult with the local water commissioner to assure no injury to <br />water rights occur. <br />Please address each of these concerns and provide a response and amended application <br />materials, if appropriate. <br />11. There is no description of water quality for the alluvial wells. In accordance with Rule <br />2.04.7(1) please add a description of seasonal water quantity and quality for the alluvial <br />groundwater monitoring wells. <br />12. An additional down gradient monitoring well and a point of compliance well(s) may be required. <br />Well GW-9 was installed as a result of the TR -16 review because the Division required a <br />monitoring point below the disturbance area associated with the refuse pile proposed for TR -16. <br />The new CMWP location proposed with PR -2 will extend fiuther to the southwest beyond the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.